Prioritizing the Factors Affecting  Job Satisfaction among Hospitals Staff Affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

رعدابادی, مهدی; جعفری, مهدی; فر, جمیل صادقی; پورشرعیاتی, فاطمه; Aghili, Amin

doi:10.29252/sjimu.26.1.195

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, challenges related to the abstractness of the concepts and the di culty of measuring them in the form of academic activities have resulted in negative attitudes towards cultural material among university instructors. The results of some previous studies which show a negative attitude towards cultural activity related to faculty members (32) and the inevitable need to develop both appropriate qualitative and quantitative indicators to measure cultural, disciplinary, and social activities are consistent with the results of our research (33).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Challenges and Solutions for The Promotion of Medical Sciences Faculty Members in Iran: A Systematic Review

Salajegheh¹,

Hekmat²,

Macky³

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Faculty members play an important role in achieving the goals of higher education and take the responsibility of educating and disciplining students. This research aimed to investigate the challenges and concerns facing faculty member promotion regulations and provide appropriate solutions.Method: This study was a systematic review conducted by searching PubMed, Scopus, Eric, Web of Science, Cochrane, SID, Magiran, and Irandoc journals and databases with Persian and English keywords in the period from 2015 to 2020. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened and the data were extracted over two authors. Results: Thirteen articles were included. Challenges to promotion of faculty members were reviewed and grouped into five main categories: 1) the general regulations for the promotion of faculty members, 2) cultural, disciplinary, and social activities, 3) educational activities, 4) research-technology activities, and 5) scientific-executive activities. Conclusion: Despite several amendments to regulations for the promotion of faculty members, this process always encounters challenges due to the complex nature of its related tasks. This article provides tips to policymakers on regulations of promotion for educational activities.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Challenges and Solutions for The Promotion of Medical Sciences Faculty Members in Iran: A Systematic Review

Salajegheh¹,

Hekmat²,

Macky³

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The existence of many challenges to educational activities is an alert for policymakers of the higher education promotion system. As reported in some studies, one of the main concerns of faculty members is the lack of attention to the quality of education [ 38 , 26 ]. Therefore, the educational activities need to evaluate from a qualitative perspective and direct towards innovation, teamwork, and inter professional activities which ultimately aim to improve the organizational development [ 39 , 40 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Due to the value of research in addressing public concerns, it is necessary to direct the relevant activities of faculty members towards responsiveness the needs of society, creating change, advancing the scientific field, and engagement in the national policymaking process [ 38 ]. Qualitative review of a limited number of faculty members’ papers would draw more attention to the quality of research instead of concentrating on increasing the number of papers [ 39 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Challenges and solutions for the promotion of medical sciences faculty members in Iran: a systematic review

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction The faculty promotion system is expected to benefit the faculty, institute, and profession and lead to the sustainable and comprehensive development. This present systematic review aims to investigate the challenges and solutions for the promotion of medical sciences faculty members in Iran. Method This study was a systematic review conducted by searching in PubMed, Scopus, Eric, Web of Science, Cochrane, SID, Magiran, and https://irandoc.ac.ir/line with Persian and English terms in the period from 2015 to 2020. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by reviewers. Results Thirteen articles were included. Challenges and solutions for the promotion of medical sciences faculty members were reviewed and grouped into five main categories: 1. The general regulations for the promotion of faculty members, 2. Cultural, disciplinary, and social activities, 3. Educational activities, 4. Research-technology activities, and 5. Scientific-executive activities. Conclusion Despite several modifications to regulations for the promotion of medical sciences faculty members in Iran, this process still encounters challenges because of its complex nature. This article provides tips to policymakers on regulations of promotion for educational activities.

show abstract

“…The way such choices are made and the factors driving them have attracted many researchers. Previous studies indicated that the choice of hospitals is affected by several factors, such as personal preferences and interests (13, 15), service cost (3, 16–22), type and severity of the disease (13, 14, 18, 23–26), waiting time to receive services (22, 27), location and distance between the place of residence and the hospital (3, 9, 13, 16–20, 22, 28–31), availability of advanced medical equipment and technology (3, 13, 22–25, 29, 32), having health insurance (16, 23–25), interpersonal skills, and employees’ behavior (3, 16, 28, 33–35), physician’s expertise (16, 27, 29), hospital reputation (3, 16, 17, 22, 28, 34), service quality (3, 18, 20, 34–36), diversity and method of service provision (3, 16, 21), and patient’s economic capacity (13, 18, 23–26, 37). Several studies indicate that most people tend to choose qualified physicians and hospitals with a high reputation, regardless of the type and severity of their diseases in a context where citizens have full freedom (13).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

What do Iranians value most when choosing a hospital? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment

Ranjbar,

Bazyar,

Pahlevanshamsi

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Individual preferences have preceded the use of health care services, and it has been affected by different hospital attributes. This study aimed to elicit the Iranians' preferences in choosing hospitals using a discrete choice experiment. Methods: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted through face to face interviews with 301 respondents. The DCE was constructed by six attributes were included based on a literature review, qualitative interviews, Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and stakeholder consultation: waiting time, quality of care, travel time, hospital type, provider competency, and hospital facilities. individuals' preferences for hospital attributes were analyzed using a mixed logit model, and interaction terms were used to assess preference heterogeneity among individuals with different sociodemographic characteristics. Results: Participants had strong and significant preferences for care delivered in hospitals with 'full' (β=0.6052, p<0.001) or 'moderate' (β=0.5882, p<0.001) hospital equipment and with 'excellent' provider competency (β=0.2637, p<0.001). The estimated coefficients for the "waiting time of 120 minutes" (β=−0.1625, p<0.001) and the "travel time of 30 minutes" (β=−0.1157, p<0.001) were negative and significant. The results also show that the personal characteristics such as age, education level, and income significantly affected individual preferences in choosing a hospital. Conclusion: Considering people's preferences can be important given the more active role of today's patients in decision-making about their treatment processes. The results of this study should be taken into consideration by health policymakers and all stakeholders to be aware of differences in preferences of people and maximize their satisfaction. In this case, it is important to continuously involve people and consider their preferences in the design, topology, construction, and equipment of hospitals.

show abstract

Prioritizing the Factors Affecting Job Satisfaction among Hospitals Staff Affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

Cited by 3 publications

References 2 publications

Challenges and Solutions for The Promotion of Medical Sciences Faculty Members in Iran: A Systematic Review

Challenges and Solutions for The Promotion of Medical Sciences Faculty Members in Iran: A Systematic Review

Challenges and solutions for the promotion of medical sciences faculty members in Iran: a systematic review

What do Iranians value most when choosing a hospital? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About