We use a case-study approach to examine the obstacles and opportunities for public administrators who seek to uphold the civil and human rights of residents in the United States during the twenty-first century. In particular, our analysis of two cases-one historical and the other contemporary-reveals what occurs at the juncture of administrative evil and administrative racism, where politicians, policymakers, and those who implement policies engage in intentional and functional acts that harm marginalized populations. These actions, which discriminate against and oppress people and communities of color, are antithetical to the core ideals of American democracy and the central tenet of contemporary public administration: social equity. We conclude by offering practical and pedagogical prescriptions to strengthen social equity for all members of the American public in the hope of achieving Martin Luther King's dream of a Beloved Community. Evidence for Practice • Public administrators must understand the role the profession has played-as a result of their actions and inactions-in inflicting pain and suffering across various segments of American society. • More emphasis must be placed on preparing, encouraging, and supporting practitioners and public administration students to serve the diverse public within the United States in an ethical and equitable manner. • Addressing the American dilemma of race and modern democracy will require more than effective, efficient, and economical public administration; it will also demand ethical public administration anchored by the value of social equity.