2023
DOI: 10.1002/fee.2672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prioritizing science efforts to inform decision making on public lands

Sarah K Carter,
Travis S Haby,
Jennifer K Meineke
et al.

Abstract: Public land management agencies in the US are committed to using science‐informed decision making, but there has been little research on the types and topics of science that managers need most to inform their decisions. We used the National Environmental Policy Act to identify four types of science information needed for making decisions relevant to public lands: (1) data on resources of concern, (2) scientific studies relevant to potential effects of proposed actions, (3) methods for quantifying potential eff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis of litigation records covered Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming because the original study we drew upon focused on the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) Upper Colorado Basin. We conducted the analysis of Environmental Assessments (EAs) and Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) solely in Colorado because the frequency and distribution of proposed actions (e.g., fluid minerals development) in the state are similar to patterns exhibited on the national scale (Carter et al, 2023). Based on the locations and jurisdictions of our BLM project team members, our study area for the semi-structured interviews consisted of the states of Arizona, California, Colorado, and New Mexico.…”
Section: Study Area and Project Teammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis of litigation records covered Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming because the original study we drew upon focused on the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) Upper Colorado Basin. We conducted the analysis of Environmental Assessments (EAs) and Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) solely in Colorado because the frequency and distribution of proposed actions (e.g., fluid minerals development) in the state are similar to patterns exhibited on the national scale (Carter et al, 2023). Based on the locations and jurisdictions of our BLM project team members, our study area for the semi-structured interviews consisted of the states of Arizona, California, Colorado, and New Mexico.…”
Section: Study Area and Project Teammentioning
confidence: 99%