2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prioritizing rat eradication on islands by cost and effectiveness to protect nesting seabirds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past decades, across the 1128 successful eradication programmes that have been implemented on individual islands [48], the overall risks of extinction due to IAS have been substantially reduced for only 11 bird, five mammal and one amphibian species [6]. Eradication programmes on islands should be prioritized on the basis of not only eradication feasibility, economic cost, reinvasion potential and the most problematic IAS [15,49,50], but also the potential outcome for global biodiversity. We were able to determine where the most important clusters of IAS-threatened species are, and which IAS are responsible for these effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decades, across the 1128 successful eradication programmes that have been implemented on individual islands [48], the overall risks of extinction due to IAS have been substantially reduced for only 11 bird, five mammal and one amphibian species [6]. Eradication programmes on islands should be prioritized on the basis of not only eradication feasibility, economic cost, reinvasion potential and the most problematic IAS [15,49,50], but also the potential outcome for global biodiversity. We were able to determine where the most important clusters of IAS-threatened species are, and which IAS are responsible for these effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, complete eradification may be difficult and costly, and long term sustainability requires stringent quarantine regulations to prevent future reinvasions [63]. Eradication would also require considerable political will and a relatively high level of financial investment.…”
Section: Implications For Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Islands are, however, abundant and invasive species management funds scarce, and financial costeffectiveness is increasingly considered a variable of predominant importance in conservation prioritisation (Brooke et al 2007;Capizzi et al 2010;Moore et al 2010;Myers et al 2000;Naidoo et al 2006;Pimentel et al 2005). We are of the opinion, however, that the initial prioritization of island eradications should not depend on immediate financial cost-effectiveness but on their potential contribution to long-term or sustainable wildlife conservation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%