2022
DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.4835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prioritizing Prevention of Teen Dating Violence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strategies involving a multi-level approach (school, home, and community) [ 59 ] that not only involve curricular content but help students recognize warning signs of DV to include attention to gender equity, gender identity, sexual attraction, and sexual and reproductive health education may have a greater impact. Other interventions that include parental monitoring (parents knowing about child´s activities, children disclosing these activities, and rule setting) and the involvement of families also appear promising (i.e., Families for Safe Dates, Project STRONG, and components of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention multicomponent program “Dating Matters”) [ 60 , 61 , 62 ] compared in an RCT (Dating Matters vs. Safe Dates) with middle school students showed, on average, lower DV rates of perpetration and victimization and lower use of negative conflict resolution strategies [ 63 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Strategies involving a multi-level approach (school, home, and community) [ 59 ] that not only involve curricular content but help students recognize warning signs of DV to include attention to gender equity, gender identity, sexual attraction, and sexual and reproductive health education may have a greater impact. Other interventions that include parental monitoring (parents knowing about child´s activities, children disclosing these activities, and rule setting) and the involvement of families also appear promising (i.e., Families for Safe Dates, Project STRONG, and components of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention multicomponent program “Dating Matters”) [ 60 , 61 , 62 ] compared in an RCT (Dating Matters vs. Safe Dates) with middle school students showed, on average, lower DV rates of perpetration and victimization and lower use of negative conflict resolution strategies [ 63 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The restrictions imposed during confinement changed the way in which young people interacted with each other, including the use of online dating and sex, which may have increased the risk of cyber-aggression. Lastly, prevention programs that focus on youth, such as our study sample, facing marginalization (race and ethnicity, sexual orientation, or gender identity) deserve our utmost attention [ 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors also noted iatrogenic effects in several randomized studies, including increases in physical/sexual dating violence and sexual harassment (Piolanti & Foran, 2021). Taken together, this creates an important moment for reflection and a need to pause and critically examine this signal to ensure we are not inadvertently doing harm with our SV/ARA intervention approaches, as well as the need to formulate hypotheses as to why prevention programming might be contributing to increases in SV perpetration (Ragavan & Miller, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among those who would seek help, parents and guardians emerged as a frequently cited source of support. Parents are an important support for ARA survivors, as multiple studies have shown significant associations between increased parental monitoring and communication and decreased ARA victimization and perpetration (Khetarpal et al, 2022; Ragavan & Miller, 2022). Interestingly, prior work focused on physical and sexual ARA had differing findings from our study, particularly that adolescents may disclose less frequently to parents compared with sharing with peers (Fry et al, 2014; Mapes & Cavell, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%