2020
DOI: 10.9734/jpri/2020/v32i330415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prioritizing Medication Management Criteria of National Hospital Accreditation Standards Using FDANP Model

Abstract: Introduction: Accreditation is an evaluating tool of health care systems especially in hospitals: Iran’s Ministry of Health emphasizes its importance. We attempted this descriptive study to classify medication management criteria of hospital accreditation standards using a hybrid approach of fuzzy DEMATEL based on ANP (FDANP). Methods: This study included all Iran’s hospitals. Nine medication management criteria and their sub-criteria were evaluated. AHP questionnaire was used for data collection. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While FDEMATEL on its own can map out complex constructs and analyze a structural model involving cause and effect interrelationships [ 111 ], the integration of ANP provides an even more comprehensive measurement of ratio scale priorities for the distribution of influence among criteria and group of criteria in the decision problem [ 112 ]. FDANP, along with other MCDM methodologies, has been applied in various research areas, such as prioritizing criteria for national hospital accreditation [ 113 ], quality assessment of higher education institutions [ 114 ], and ranking lean production factors [ 115 ]. However, the FDANP has never been applied in the context of crisis management.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While FDEMATEL on its own can map out complex constructs and analyze a structural model involving cause and effect interrelationships [ 111 ], the integration of ANP provides an even more comprehensive measurement of ratio scale priorities for the distribution of influence among criteria and group of criteria in the decision problem [ 112 ]. FDANP, along with other MCDM methodologies, has been applied in various research areas, such as prioritizing criteria for national hospital accreditation [ 113 ], quality assessment of higher education institutions [ 114 ], and ranking lean production factors [ 115 ]. However, the FDANP has never been applied in the context of crisis management.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang et al [18] thought that the FDM was the most effective method to evaluate the vulnerability of urban wetland ecological environments. Izadpanah et al [78] used the hybrid approach of FDANP to classify the medication management criteria of hospital accreditation standards. Shakeri et al [79] used the FDANP technique to prioritize the determinants of maternal health promotion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To design a model of student support in e-learning, the panel of the main categories extracted from content analysis in the expert session was compared in pairs to prioritize the domains through AHP based on [20,21,23,25] (Tab. 4).…”
Section: ) Instructor Evaluation By the Studentmentioning
confidence: 99%