2017
DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2017.1.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prioritizing e-learning websites evaluation and selection criteria using fuzzy set theory

Abstract: E-learning websites evaluation and selection is extremely important for the establishment of effective E-learning. The E-learning website selection has crucial importance for the educational sector. The selection of E-learning website problem is generally considered as a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) problem which mainly consists of both qualitative and quantitative criteria. The development of an E-learning website mainly depends on the success of the Elearning website selection along with various alt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It demonstrated the influenced six implementations' possibility recompensing in place of their adaptable details ( Lin, 2013 ). The acquired results started from the methods could be utilized by studies to verify most important sustainable science e-learning education system criteria in a corresponding education occurrence ( Garg and Jain, 2017 ; Jain et al., 2016 ; Su et al., 2016 ). The results recapitulate possible obstacles and problems originated from conventional education effects, through preferences and accomplishments for e-learning system in sustainability science education that have not yet been sufficiently utilized.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It demonstrated the influenced six implementations' possibility recompensing in place of their adaptable details ( Lin, 2013 ). The acquired results started from the methods could be utilized by studies to verify most important sustainable science e-learning education system criteria in a corresponding education occurrence ( Garg and Jain, 2017 ; Jain et al., 2016 ; Su et al., 2016 ). The results recapitulate possible obstacles and problems originated from conventional education effects, through preferences and accomplishments for e-learning system in sustainability science education that have not yet been sufficiently utilized.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 0.26 System updates Classification and description of system updates in science education indicating basic and advanced system updates' parameters related with the objectives presented. Garg and Jain (2017) ; Yang et al. (2017) ; Zare et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of previous attempts in flipped e-learning teaching, the lack of literature is still difficult to identify and analyze the elements and sub-elements of flipped e-learning systems in sustainable science education [23][24][25]. Thus, these operational methods are necessary to adjust sustainable science education of flipped e-learning system with various decision-makers on multiple criteria [26,37,38]. In particular, these operational techniques and methods are barely used in the topic of neither sustainability education nor flipped e-learning systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various aspects of flipped e-learning related applications using MCDA-FDEMATEL have been considered to display all recommendations are comparable for both flipped e-learning and traditional programs [34][35][36]. According to Garg and Jain and Yang et al, flipped e-learning science interfaces are employing with a hierarchical growth model on the basis of fuzzy MCDA method and FDEMATEL analytic grid procedure that found the influential weights jointly with the establishment [26,37,38]. Thus, these operational methods are necessary to adjust sustainable science education of flipped e-learning system with various decision-makers on multiple criteria.…”
Section: Elements' and Sub-elements' Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper used AHP method as the simplest technique of ranking. However, during the past few years, there have been other competitive techniques which can be used for ranking alternatives such as weighted distance-based approximation (WDBA) and distance-based approximation (DBA) method [62][63][64], Euclidean Distance Based Approximation (EDBA) [65], Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) and fuzzy set theory (FST) [66][67][68], Visekriterijumsko Kompromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR) MCDM method [69], Fuzzy Set Theory and Weighted Distance Based Approximation [70], Fuzzy-TOPSIS (F-TOPSIS) and TOPSIS method [71,72], Fuzzy Distance Based Approach (FDBA)' method [73], fuzzy-based matrix methodology [74], Fuzzy Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) [75], Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP), COPRAS, VIKOR, WDBA [76], Hybrid MCDM methods [77] and fuzzy ELECTRE approach [78]. Table 1.…”
Section: Critical Success Factors Determination While Assessing the Nmentioning
confidence: 99%