2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-87725-5_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prioritized SIPP for Multi-agent Path Finding with Kinematic Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) by 1 s, SIPP will not find a solution. In (Ali and Yakovlev 2021), accelerating actions were straightforwardly integrated into SIPP, which, again, makes the algorithm incomplete (as we show in this work). (Cohen et al 2019) suggested a variant of SIPP for the problem setting that assumes arbitrary motion patterns.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1) by 1 s, SIPP will not find a solution. In (Ali and Yakovlev 2021), accelerating actions were straightforwardly integrated into SIPP, which, again, makes the algorithm incomplete (as we show in this work). (Cohen et al 2019) suggested a variant of SIPP for the problem setting that assumes arbitrary motion patterns.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, all of these extensions require computational time that rapidly increases with the number of agents. Other work incorporated SIPP with prioritized planning [28], [29] to improve the scalability for the continous-time setup, which nevertheless only assumed planning on a gridmap. Another apporach has addressed the scalability issue for non-grid graphs by enumerating all possible collisions before the planning [14], but this has only worked for the case of discrete time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A G-CBS (Generalized Conflict-based Search) generalized MAPF for heterogeneous agents (G-MAPF) was suggested [3]. The kinematic conditions of the agents were first considered in [4] when planning in MAPF. Multiple types of prioritized based planning algorithms and compared their results in terms of completeness and optimality of the solutions are analyzed in [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%