2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2015.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prioritized multi-task compliance control of redundant manipulators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
105
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for related work concerning this section, see for example [29], [30] that study the stability of the strict priority inverse kinematics control approach, [7], [28] for the stability of strict priority inverse dynamics, [31], [32] for the stability of the weighted approach of a multi-task controller based on control Lyapunov functions (CLF). We will base our argumentation below on Lyapunov's indirect method.…”
Section: Stability In the State Space Of The Generalized Coordinatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for related work concerning this section, see for example [29], [30] that study the stability of the strict priority inverse kinematics control approach, [7], [28] for the stability of strict priority inverse dynamics, [31], [32] for the stability of the weighted approach of a multi-task controller based on control Lyapunov functions (CLF). We will base our argumentation below on Lyapunov's indirect method.…”
Section: Stability In the State Space Of The Generalized Coordinatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although each of these problems has already been extensively studied in the context of industrial manipulators or various general cases (e.g. handling redundancy in [7], [8], underactuation in [9], [10], contacts constraints in [11]- [14], bounds on control inputs in [15], and references therein), the specificity of a humanoid robot is that it features and interleaves them all at once, and thus renders the solutions that were proposed for each of these problems taken in a separate setting largely inapplicable in a unified control framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…assembly of electronic components on the small surface of printed circuit boards). The second approach presented in only few works Seraji and Colbaugh [28], Peng and Adachi [29], Ott et al [30], Oh and Chung [31], Colbaugh and Glass [32] is based on utilizing augmented task space techniques such as the extended Jacobian Balleieul [33] or the configuration control proposed by Seraji and Colbaugh [28]. In this approach, the dimension of the operational space is extended by incorporating as many additional constraints as the degrees of redundancy, and hence, the resulting system becomes non-redundant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this approach, the dimension of the operational space is extended by incorporating as many additional constraints as the degrees of redundancy, and hence, the resulting system becomes non-redundant. The control algorithms from Seraji and Colbaugh [28], Peng and Adachi [29], Ott et al [30] require exact dynamic model thus guaranteeing the asymptotic tracking. Using extended Jacobian, nominal values of the parameters of dynamic equations and the momentum feed-back disturbance observer, a trajectory tracking control law has been proposed in Oh and Chung [31] without its stability analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a context, one can distinguish three major approaches of controlling the non-redundant and/or redundant robotic manipulators in the task space. The control techniques offered in the first approach [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][43][44][45] require the full knowledge of the dynamics neglecting the external disturbances. In the second approach, works [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] present adaptive control algorithms to compensate for parametric uncertainties in dynamic model including only the linearly parametrizable friction terms (viscous friction) and also neglecting the external (nonlinearly parametrizable) disturbances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%