2004
DOI: 10.1007/bf03030885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prioritization of watersheds using morphometric parameters and assessment of surface water potential using remote sensing

Abstract: In the present study, prioritization of sub-watersheds was carried out on the basis of sediment production rate. Further, basic hydrologic information such as peak rate of runoff and annual surface water potential were also assessed for the study watersheds and these are essential requisites for effective watershed management. The 10 sub watersheds of Tarai development project area are selected for the present study. Morphometric parameters pertaining to study area are used in the estimation of sediment produc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such studies confirm the role of geographic information system (GIS), remote sensing (RS), and morphometric analysis as efficient tools in ranking different sub-watersheds according to the order in which they have to be taken for treatment and for soil conservation measures [15]. At an early stage of morphometric analysis application in prioritization of sub-watersheds, Biswas et al [12] employ ten morphometric parameters: three of them are basin geometric parameters such as area (km 2 ), perimeter (km), and basin length (km); four linear parameters (bifurcation ratio, drainage density (km/km 2 ), stream frequency (no/km 2 ), and texture ratio).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Such studies confirm the role of geographic information system (GIS), remote sensing (RS), and morphometric analysis as efficient tools in ranking different sub-watersheds according to the order in which they have to be taken for treatment and for soil conservation measures [15]. At an early stage of morphometric analysis application in prioritization of sub-watersheds, Biswas et al [12] employ ten morphometric parameters: three of them are basin geometric parameters such as area (km 2 ), perimeter (km), and basin length (km); four linear parameters (bifurcation ratio, drainage density (km/km 2 ), stream frequency (no/km 2 ), and texture ratio).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Recent investigations carried out on watershed prioritization, employ various methods of analysis, such as morphometric analysis combined with the sediment yield index (SYI) model, and sediment product rate (SPR) [49]. Others adopted the analysis of linear and shape morphometric parameters for prioritization [50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these methods is: morphometric analysis based on linear and shape parameters [36] [38] [44]. Moreover, morphometric analysis combined with sediment yield index (SYI) model, and sediment product rate (SPR) was also utilized [40]. Other studies employed morphometric analysis, land use/land cover variables, and sediment yield index [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies employed morphometric analysis, land use/land cover variables, and sediment yield index [37]. Snyder's synthetic unit hydrograph method has incorporated in the analysis by Singh and Singh [40]. Several prioritization studies combined morphometric analysis with the USLE and RUSLE models for soil loss es- ), texture ratio, stream frequency, and overland flow (Km)); and shape parameters (elongation ratio, circularity ratio, shape factor, form factor, and compactness coefficient) are the common parameters employed to calculate the compound parameter (Cp) on which prioritization of sub-watersheds is perceived.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%