2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2011.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prioritization of components important for safety and sensitive to ageing. Application for TRIGA reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the unwanted event refers to the occurrence of the top event. It quantifies the contributions of a basic event by dividing the summation of the probabilities of all minimal cut sets containing the evaluated basic event by the probability of the top event [24]. The results of the FV importance can be used to identify potential components to be changed to improve the safety of the related system [20].…”
Section: Probability-based Importance Measure Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, the unwanted event refers to the occurrence of the top event. It quantifies the contributions of a basic event by dividing the summation of the probabilities of all minimal cut sets containing the evaluated basic event by the probability of the top event [24]. The results of the FV importance can be used to identify potential components to be changed to improve the safety of the related system [20].…”
Section: Probability-based Importance Measure Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk achievement worth (RAW) is commonly used to determine whether the structure, system and component (SSC) degradation may be important to risk [24]. It measures risk relative increase due to the occurrence of a particular event, such as the unavailability of a system [26].…”
Section: Probability-based Importance Measure Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the prioritization of SCEs can substantially improve the reliability and productivity of equipment and processes. This study uses a modified FMEA tool, called Ageing Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (AFMEA) (Nitoi et al, 2011) for ranking and prioritising the SCEs. The Risk Priority Number (RPN) for potential ageing-related failure modes are evaluated using 10point rating scales for severity of impact (S), likelihood of occurrence (O) and likelihood of detection (D) which are tabulated in Tables (2)-(4).…”
Section: Screening and Prioritization Of Scesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the time passes, the functional capabilities of structures, systems and components (SSCs) deteriorate by ageing [10,11]. Ageing is a process in which the reliability of any equipment depreciates, and hence the likelihood of that equipment to fail increases [12].…”
Section: Introduction mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the physical ageing is caused by the physical, chemical and/or biological mechanisms such as thermal and/or radiation embrittlement [1]. Furthermore, Nitoi et al [10] confirmed four issues that need to be dealt with regarding the ageing management. Firstly, SSCs, which are sensitive to ageing, need to be identified.…”
Section: Introduction mentioning
confidence: 99%