Prioritising target behaviours for research in diabetes: Using the nominal group technique to achieve consensus from key stakeholders

Abstract

Plain english summaryThe behaviour of people with diabetes (e.g. taking medication) and the behaviour of doctors and other healthcare professionals (e.g. checking patients’ blood sugar) are important. Our research group wanted to select one patient behaviour and one healthcare professional behaviour as topics to research in Ireland. Patients and healthcare professionals are not usually asked to help decide on research topics. In this study, we wanted to bring together patients, healthcare professionals and policy makers to help us decide on the most important target behaviours for research in diabetes in Ireland.We worked with 24 participants, including people with diabetes, diabetes healthcare professionals and policy makers. First, participants suggested behaviours they thought were important to target for research in diabetes. Participants then attended a meeting and ranked which of the behaviours were the most important and discussed the results of the rankings as a group. We identified the most highly ranked patient and healthcare professional behaviours. The top ranked behaviour for people with Type 1 diabetes was to ‘take insulin as required’ and for people with Type 2 diabetes was to ‘attend and engage with structured education programmes’. ‘Engage in collaborative goal setting with patients’ was the top ranked behaviour for healthcare professionals.Our study shows it is possible for researchers to work with people with diabetes, healthcare professionals and policy makers to decide on research topics. The top ranked behaviours will now be researched by our group in Ireland.Abstract Background Working with patients, healthcare providers, and policy makers to prioritise research topics may enhance the relevance of research and increase the likelihood of translating research findings into practice. The aim of the present study was to work with key stakeholders to identify, and achieve consensus on, the most important target behaviours for research in diabetes in Ireland. Methods Twenty-four participants, including people with diabetes, diabetes healthcare professionals and policy makers, took part in a nominal group technique consensus process. Through an online survey, participants generated lists of important target behaviours in three areas: managing Type 1 diabetes, managing Type 2 diabetes and preventing Type 2 diabetes. Participants then attended a research prioritisation meeting and ranked target behaviours in two rounds, with group discussion between ranking rounds. For each of the three key areas, the six top ranked behaviours relevant to people with diabetes and healthcare professionals were identified. Results In most cases, the most highly ranked behaviour was the same for Ranking 1 and Ranking 2 and consensus increased in relation to endorsement of top ranked behaviours. However, some behaviours did change position between rankings. The top behaviour relevant to people with Type 1 diabetes was ‘taking insulin as required’ and for people with Type 2 diabetes was ‘attending and engaging with struc...

Barriers and facilitators to attendance at Type 2 diabetes structured education programmes: a qualitative study of educators and attendees

“…In line with international evidence, Irish audit data indicate that the number of people attending is far lower than the number of people newly diagnosed each year [12]. Consequently, a research prioritization exercise with people with diabetes, healthcare professionals and policy-makers identified improving attendance at structured Type 2 diabetes education programmes as a top priority for research in Ireland [13].…”

‘It's an important part, but I am not quite sure that it is working’: educators’ perspectives on the implementation of goal‐setting within the ‘DAFNE’ diabetes structured education programme

“…These strategies need to be carefully selected for the target audience and crucially, need to be implemented correctly [13]. In support of HCPs' role in goal-setting, a recent research prioritization involving key diabetes stakeholders identified 'goal-setting with patients' as a focus area for research in diabetes [14]. DSME providers are typically healthcare professionals (HCPs), responsible for translating the behaviour change content of programme manuals into practice.…”

“…However, limited research has explored educators' perspectives on putting behaviour change elements such as goal-setting into practice. In support of HCPs' role in goal-setting, a recent research prioritization involving key diabetes stakeholders identified 'goal-setting with patients' as a focus area for research in diabetes [14].…”

An international, Delphi consensus study to identify priorities for methodological research in behavioral trials in health research

“…Research prioritization provides such a process, whereby key stakeholders generate ideas and move towards consensus on important research topics [43]. The prioritization process has been used to identify priorities across conditions and populations [26]. In the area of trials' research prioritization has been conducted with Directors of UK Clinical Research Collaboration Clinical Trials Units to inform the broader trials' methodological research agenda [49] and, more recently, a priority setting exercise has been reported to inform the global health trials' methodology research agenda [46].…”