2020
DOI: 10.1002/pmh.1485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Priorities for service improvement in personality disorder in Australia: Perspectives of consumers, carers and clinicians

Abstract: Background-Improvements to service provision for personality disorder has been predominately explored through the perspectives of clinicians, with limited understanding of the views of consumers and carers. The aim of the present study was to understand the priorities for service improvement through multiple perspectives. Method-Twelve roundtables, with a total of 53 consumers, clinicians and carers, discussed how organizations could improve service provision for people with personality disorder and completed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the high levels of need within community services (defined in this study as publicly-funded primary care services, non-specialist secondary mental health services, specialist community 'personality disorder' services and non-profit community organisations and networks that work with people with CEN, and excluding community forensic mental health services) and the considerable variability in service quality, a growing number of international policy guidelines are intended to improve and enhance community care for people with CEN [20,21]. Yet, the data sources used to develop many of these guidelines fail to incorporate the views and perspectives of service users and the family and friends who support them [20,22]. In addition, most research on care models for people with CEN focus on psychological interventions, especially those intended to reduce self-harm [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the high levels of need within community services (defined in this study as publicly-funded primary care services, non-specialist secondary mental health services, specialist community 'personality disorder' services and non-profit community organisations and networks that work with people with CEN, and excluding community forensic mental health services) and the considerable variability in service quality, a growing number of international policy guidelines are intended to improve and enhance community care for people with CEN [20,21]. Yet, the data sources used to develop many of these guidelines fail to incorporate the views and perspectives of service users and the family and friends who support them [20,22]. In addition, most research on care models for people with CEN focus on psychological interventions, especially those intended to reduce self-harm [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peer support may be beneficial for consumers with BPD and their carers to help enhance recovery. Peer support has been recommended for consumers with BPD to improve relationships and sense of self [10], and to improve personality disorder services [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increasing interest in recovery, the study of the lived experience of BPD is critical to progressing the field. To date, the small body of qualitative literature exploring the experiences and perspectives of people with BPD have focused on life histories and trauma (Holm et al, 2009 ), daily life (Spodenkiewicz et al, 2013 ) experience of the BPD diagnosis (Courtney & Makinen, 2016 ; Horn et al, 2007 ; Sulzer et al, 2016 ), service user perspectives (Fallon, 2003 ; Morris et al, 2014 ; Ng et al, 2020 ; Redding et al, 2017 ; Rogers & Acton, 2012 ; Rogers & Dunne, 2011 ; Stapleton & Wright, 2017 ) and more recently the emerging area of recovery (Gillard et al, 2015 ; Holm & Severinsson, 2011 ; Katsakou & Pistrang, 2017 ; Lariviere et al, 2015 ; Ng et al, 2016 ; Ng, Carter, et al, 2019 ; Ng, Townsend, et al, 2019 ). However, few studies have explored the lived experiences and perspectives of individuals with who are at different stages of recovery to understand some of factors that may contribute to outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%