Priorities for addressing substance use disorder in humanitarian settings

Abstract

Background Populations affected by humanitarian emergencies are vulnerable to substance (alcohol and other drug) use disorders, yet treatment and prevention services are scarce. Delivering substance use disorder treatment services in humanitarian settings is hampered by limited guidance around the preparation, implementation, and evaluation of substance use disorder treatment programs. This study aims to identify and prioritize key gaps and opportunities for addressing substance use disorder in humanitarian settings. Methods UNODC convened a consultation meeting (n = 110) in coordination with UNHCR and WHO and administered an online survey (n = 34) to, thirteen program administrators and policymakers, eleven service providers, nine researchers, and one person with lived experience to explore best practices and challenges to addressing substance use disorder in diverse populations and contexts. Participants presented best practices for addressing substance use disorder, identified and ranked challenges and opportunities for improving the delivery of substance use disorder treatment interventions, and provided recommendations for guidelines that would facilitate the delivery of substance use disorder treatment services in humanitarian emergencies. Results Participants agreed on key principles for delivering substance use disorder treatment in humanitarian settings that centered on community engagement and building trust, integrated service delivery models, reducing stigma, considering culture and context in service delivery, and an ethical ‘do no harm’ approach. Specific gaps in knowledge that precluded the delivery of appropriate substance use disorder treatment include limited knowledge of the burden and patterns of substance use in humanitarian settings, the effectiveness of substance use disorder treatment services in humanitarian settings, and strategies for adapting and implementing interventions for a given population and humanitarian context. Participants emphasized the need to strengthen awareness and commitment related to the burden of substance use disorder treatment interventions among communities, practitioners, and policymakers in humanitarian settings. Conclusions Results from this consultation process highlight existing gaps in knowledge related to the epidemiology and treatment of substance use disorders in humanitarian emergencies. Epidemiological, intervention, and implementation research as well as operational guidance are needed to fill these gaps and improve access to substance use treatment services in humanitarian settings.

Substance (mis)use among refugees as a matter of social ecology: insights into a multi-site rapid assessment in Germany

“…The prevalence of increased substance use and substance use disorder (SUD) as a consequence of war and (armed) conflict has become evident in previous research [ 1 – 4 ]. According to Greene et al [ 5 ], this is due not only to SUD co-occurrence with exposure to traumatic events, distress, and general mental health problems but also to increased drug availability as a result of the “breakdown of social norms around substance use” (p. 17) or the failure of government control [ 4 ].…”

Tobacco prevention and control interventions in humanitarian settings: a scoping review protocol

“…There is lack of evidence pertaining to the trend of tobacco usage patterns, tobacco interventions and implementation challenges among civilians in humanitarian settings affected by armed conflict, despite key vulnerability factors prevailing in those settings. Due to the lack of structure in governance, poor policy-making, underdeveloped health systems and weak regulatory environments, it is challenging to implement tobacco control measures 10 11. Consequently, the prevalence of tobacco usage is almost always higher in these settings as compared with non-humanitarian regions.…”

Substance Use Among Residents of Homeless Shelters During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings From France

“…However, these changes are complex and ongoing. On the one hand, environmental stress is a known risk factor for substance use disorders [ 5 ], with increases in alcohol and tobacco consumption recorded during natural disasters [ 6 , 7 ] terrorist incidents [ 8 , 9 ] and humanitarian conflicts [ 10 , 11 ]. The stress of the COVID-19 pandemic, alongside associated increases in social isolation [ 12 ], may have therefore contributed to increasing rates of substance use [ 13 ].…”