2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00308-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Priorities among recommended clinical preventive services11The full text of this article is available via AJPM Online at www.elsevier.com/locate/ajpmonline.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 278 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that preventive (primary, secondary and tertiary) (38) healthcare (3942), access to care, including the availability of a usual source of care (43), and continuity of care (44), and adequate treatment (45, 46) have been linked to better health outcomes and lower healthcare costs, we propose that the dissipation of some of the advantageous demographic factors among immigrants, three-fifths of which are under the age of 45-years, and especially non-citizens, where less than 6% are 65-years or older, is prospectively conducive to higher and delayed pressures on the U.S. healthcare system. Indeed, as both the native and immigrant U.S. populations age and the prevalence of chronic conditions increases, the brunt of these effects could be potentially borne by an overextended healthcare system (47–51); largely the public sector and primarily in the form of more costly services including emergency care and hospitalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that preventive (primary, secondary and tertiary) (38) healthcare (3942), access to care, including the availability of a usual source of care (43), and continuity of care (44), and adequate treatment (45, 46) have been linked to better health outcomes and lower healthcare costs, we propose that the dissipation of some of the advantageous demographic factors among immigrants, three-fifths of which are under the age of 45-years, and especially non-citizens, where less than 6% are 65-years or older, is prospectively conducive to higher and delayed pressures on the U.S. healthcare system. Indeed, as both the native and immigrant U.S. populations age and the prevalence of chronic conditions increases, the brunt of these effects could be potentially borne by an overextended healthcare system (47–51); largely the public sector and primarily in the form of more costly services including emergency care and hospitalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although individual smoking cessation is a cost-effective clinical intervention, 121,122 and, along with systems change, is recommended by Best Practices , 38 the reach and impact of the program were low. A DOH evaluation contractor, RTI International, reported in June 2010 that AHECs’ cessation training programs reached just 4.2% of Florida’s physicians, 3.2% of physician assistants, and 2.4% of registered nurses in fiscal year 2009.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strict home smoking bans contribute to preventing and reducing children’s exposure to SHS and increasing parental smoking cessation [13,14]. Moreover, smoking cessation is a priority for reducing the harms and burden caused by smoking attributable diseases [15,16]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%