Prior’s Fable and the limits of de re possibility

Ujvári, Márta

doi:10.1007/s11229-011-9938-0

Synthese

2011

DOI: 10.1007/s11229-011-9938-0

|View full text |Cite

Prior’s Fable and the limits of de re possibility

Márta Ujvári

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2014

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite1

Independent0

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Mereological Principles in Metaphysics

Ujvári

2014

Metaphysica

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The relevance of mereology for metaphysics is a perennial theme. In particular, the part-whole relation is applied recently to colocated qua-objects of different sortals: say, a statue and its constituting piece of clay. K. Koslicki (2008. The structure of objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press) claims that only the lump is part of the statue; moreover, its proper part, but not vice versa since the statue has an immaterial part not shared by the lump. She backs her claim by appealing to the weak supplementation principle (WSP). M. Donnelly (2011. "Using mereological principles to support metaphysics." The philosophical quarterly 61:225-46) is critical with the asymmetry argument. I point out that the asymmetry argument trades on the equivocity of the very notion of "part". In the Aristotelian-scholastic tradition Koslicki's neoAristotelianism appeals to, "part" shows up with various meanings not all of them admitting the mereological reading of "part" her argument hinges on. With her argument, the absurd consequence ensues that the lump can also be shown to have an immaterial part not shared by the statue. I show that the presumed immaterial parts cannot be proper parts of composites, only their improper parts. Thus they fail to fall under (WSP). My ultimate goal is to disentangle the mereological and the metaphysical threads by showing what goes with what without taking sides either with the mereologist or the traditional metaphysician.

show abstract

Mereological Principles in Metaphysics

Ujvári

2014

Metaphysica

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Prior’s Fable and the limits of de re possibility

Cited by 1 publication

References 1 publication

Mereological Principles in Metaphysics

Mereological Principles in Metaphysics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About