2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2009.07696
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prior probability distributions of neutron star crust models

Lauren Balliet,
William Newton,
Sarah Cantu
et al.

Abstract: To make best use of multi-faceted data sets in the age of multi-messenger astronomy and the results of nuclear experimental and theoretical studies, probability distributions of neutron star models that can be used to propagate errors from one domain to another are required. In this paper we prepare two ensembles of neutron star crust models that can be used as prior distributions in Bayesian studies. The ensembles are generated by input distributions of the first three coefficients of the expansion of the nuc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the transition between the neutron star crust and the core is not a sharp one, but covers a density range, which is dependent on the specific Skyrme model considered. 64 How the magnetic flux distribution changes from the innermost crustal layer, through this extended transition into the core is not known and these lower density regions likely impact on the ground state of the superconducting protons, making our predictions less robust. Second, the physical parameters (in particular the neutron coherence length, ξ n ) that influence the phases of the superconductor vary significantly in the region close to the crust-core interface, and so the concept of a local ground state becomes less meaningful.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…First, the transition between the neutron star crust and the core is not a sharp one, but covers a density range, which is dependent on the specific Skyrme model considered. 64 How the magnetic flux distribution changes from the innermost crustal layer, through this extended transition into the core is not known and these lower density regions likely impact on the ground state of the superconducting protons, making our predictions less robust. Second, the physical parameters (in particular the neutron coherence length, ξ n ) that influence the phases of the superconductor vary significantly in the region close to the crust-core interface, and so the concept of a local ground state becomes less meaningful.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In Figure 20 we plot the pressure (Figure 20a) and chemical potential (Figure 20b) at which we perform each of our calculations as a function of the densities of each local minimum as blue diamonds. We compare this with the pressure and neutron chemical potential as calculated with the compressible liquid drop model (CLDM) using the surface parameters that give closest agreement to 3DHF results (as described in [53]). First, we note that spurious shell effects caused by the discretization of the neutron energy spectrum and corresponding change in the density of states means we don't expect the pressure and neutron chemical potential to match exactly the CLDM results.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Pasta could account for 50% of the crust by mass [52,53], so there are observational consequences to the microscopic organization of pasta. The increased resistivity of disordered pasta could lead to potentially observable effects on the cooling curves of X-ray binaries [54] and the evolution of pulsar magnetic fields [55].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use an extended Skyrme mean field model for the uniform matter EOS . Three parameters of the model affect only the pure neutron matter EOS, and can be written in terms of 𝐽, 𝐿 and 𝐾 sym (Newton & Crocombe 2020;Balliet et al 2020). This way, a given set of values {𝐽, 𝐿, 𝐾 sym } can be converted into a set of Skyrme models (each of which labeled by the 3 symmetry energy parameters) and corresponding crust models and equations of state.…”
Section: The Nuclear Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%