Prior Learning Assessment Corner: The Arguments For Prior Learning Assessment

Pearson, Walter

doi:10.1080/07377366.2001.10400445

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Empirical support for the meshing hypothesis" below), there is a substantial paucity of empirical evidence to support it (e.g., Willingham et al, 2015). This has even led textbook publisher Pearson (2016) to issue a white paper that states that "there is a striking lack of evidence to support the core learning styles claim that customizing instruction based on students' preferred learning styles produces better learning than effective universal instruction" (p. 3).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The persistence of matching teaching and learning styles: A review of the ubiquity of this neuromyth, predictors of its endorsement, and recommendations to end it

Brown

2023

Front. Educ.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Educational neuroscience tries to bridge neuroscience and education. It tries to combat neuromyths: beliefs that appear grounded in neuroscientific research but that are not supported by empirical evidence. One such neuromyth claims that matching teaching style to students’ preferred learning styles (e.g., visual teaching to visual learning) will lead to improved academic outcomes. The only formal way to test this meshing hypothesis is by finding a statistical crossover interaction effect which shows that matching teaching and learning styles improves academic outcomes, while non-matching teaching and learning styles negatively affects academic outcomes. Several studies are reviewed and none of these yielded empirical support for the meshing hypothesis. Reviewed studies suggest that educators widely believe the veracity of the meshing hypothesis. Predictive factors are discussed: even having some formal knowledge of neuroscience does not protect educators from endorsing neuromyths like the meshing hypothesis. An elaboration on teaching focused neuroscience to future educators is provided as a potential solution.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%