2016
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prior knowledge transfer across transcriptional data sets and technologies using compositional statistics yields new mislabelled ovarian cell line

Abstract: Here, we describe gene expression compositional assignment (GECA), a powerful, yet simple method based on compositional statistics that can validate the transfer of prior knowledge, such as gene lists, into independent data sets, platforms and technologies. Transcriptional profiling has been used to derive gene lists that stratify patients into prognostic molecular subgroups and assess biomarker performance in the pre-clinical setting. Archived public data sets are an invaluable resource for subsequent in sili… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(67 reference statements)
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because in vivo use of TNFα would likely induce inflammation and other undesirable side effects [33], we chose to further examine if ESA reduces FTE or HGSOC viability. ESA treatment reduced cell viability of transformed FTE cells, as well as OVSAHO cells (HGSOC, TP53-mutant, BRCA2deletion, PGR positive), PEO1 cells (HGSOC, TP53-mutant, BRCA2-mutant, PGR negative), and OVCAR5 (likely a gastrointestinal carcinoma [34], TP53-mutant, BRCA-wildtype, PGR status unknown) ( Fig. 4A).…”
Section: α-Eleostearic Acid Reduces Survival Of Transformed Fte and Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because in vivo use of TNFα would likely induce inflammation and other undesirable side effects [33], we chose to further examine if ESA reduces FTE or HGSOC viability. ESA treatment reduced cell viability of transformed FTE cells, as well as OVSAHO cells (HGSOC, TP53-mutant, BRCA2deletion, PGR positive), PEO1 cells (HGSOC, TP53-mutant, BRCA2-mutant, PGR negative), and OVCAR5 (likely a gastrointestinal carcinoma [34], TP53-mutant, BRCA-wildtype, PGR status unknown) ( Fig. 4A).…”
Section: α-Eleostearic Acid Reduces Survival Of Transformed Fte and Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of cell lines derived from either endometrioid or clear cell ovarian cancers is more limited than high-grade serous cell lines. However, molecular profiling, including attention to gene mutations common in these endometriosis-associated ovarian cancers (i.e., ARID1A , PIK3CA , CTNNB1 , PTEN , and KRAS ) and mutations common in high-grade serous (i.e., TP53), have allowed better molecular and biological distinction [ 176 , 177 , 178 , 179 , 180 , 181 , 182 ]. Table 4 shows the common endometrioid and clear-cell ovarian cancer cell lines, including lines that were not derived from endometriosis-associated ovarian cancers, but which may molecularly represent non-high grade serous cell lines.…”
Section: Model Systems For Studying Rare Ovarian Cancersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the power of gene expression profiling of a disease reference data we have robustly allocated a panel of commonly used leukaemia cell lines to disease sub‐groups. GECA, G ene E xpression C ompositional A ssignment (Blayney et al , ), is an in silico method using compositional statistics to transfer prior knowledge from a reference data set to an unclassified query set. The approach enables the comparison of similarities in gene expression profiles across independent datasets, platforms and technologies, thus removing cross platform normalisation.…”
Section: Relative Influence Of Each Disease Sub‐group On the Moleculamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach enables the comparison of similarities in gene expression profiles across independent datasets, platforms and technologies, thus removing cross platform normalisation. GECA had been applied to a library of epithelial ovarian cell lines with respect to a reference set of solid tumours (Blayney et al , ).…”
Section: Relative Influence Of Each Disease Sub‐group On the Moleculamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation