2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep38261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prior Knowledge Facilitates Mutual Gaze Convergence and Head Nodding Synchrony in Face-to-face Communication

Abstract: As prior knowledge is claimed to be an essential key to achieve effective education, we are interested in exploring whether prior knowledge enhances communication effectiveness. To demonstrate the effects of prior knowledge, mutual gaze convergence and head nodding synchrony are observed as indicators of communication effectiveness. We conducted an experiment on lecture task between lecturer and student under 2 conditions: prior knowledge and non-prior knowledge. The students in prior knowledge condition were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected this degree and interval of gaze shifting because in our pilot study, the participants reported that it is perceived as gaze breaking enough while it is not too eerie to distract the participants during the interaction, which is a good choice to be considered as a substitution of eyeballs averting in our study. This behaviour will be activated when the robot can detect human face at the middle of its camera vision frame continuously for more than 3, 5, 7, or 9 seconds (randomly) to avert its gaze direction from interactional partner according to our previous studies 59 , 60 , which suggest that human has momentary mutual gaze convergence or fixation at their partner both in face-to-face communication and collaborative task.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We selected this degree and interval of gaze shifting because in our pilot study, the participants reported that it is perceived as gaze breaking enough while it is not too eerie to distract the participants during the interaction, which is a good choice to be considered as a substitution of eyeballs averting in our study. This behaviour will be activated when the robot can detect human face at the middle of its camera vision frame continuously for more than 3, 5, 7, or 9 seconds (randomly) to avert its gaze direction from interactional partner according to our previous studies 59 , 60 , which suggest that human has momentary mutual gaze convergence or fixation at their partner both in face-to-face communication and collaborative task.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to human’s head nodding behaviour, humans do not only unconsciously have head nodding synchrony with their interactional partner 40 , 59 , 61 , 62 , but also initiates own nodding 38 and responds to interactional partner’s head nodding as backchanneling behaviour as well 33 . We then applied such head nodding behaviour to NAO Robot.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analyzed the time-series data on head motion acceleration of each participant to detect synchronization using the method described by Thepsoonthorn et al (2016) . This method consists of three main steps.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the pool of 18 participants, two with instructor training (Educational Sciences) for at least 2 years were selected and assigned as instructors. Only two instructors were used in order to make the teaching style as similar as possible across dyads (Thepsoonthorn et al, 2016). The remaining 16 participants were learners, 6 randomly assigned to the 2 instructors.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%