2023
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/ace46c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prior knowledge-based residuals shrinkage prototype networks for cross-domain fault diagnosis

Abstract: In engineering practice, device failure samples are limited in the case of unexpected catastrophic faults, thereby limiting the application of deep learning in fault diagnosis. In this study, we propose a prior knowledge-based residual shrinkage prototype network (PK-RSPN) to resolve the fault diagnosis challenges under limited labeled samples. First, our method combines general supervised learning and metric meta-learning to extract prior knowledge from the labeled source data by utilizing a denoised residual… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ProNet [36] uses distance measures to determine the similarity between classification tasks and sample prototypes. In the training of the meta-task, the support set samples are used to generate feature vectors through the feature extractor f φ (•), where φ represents the model parameters.…”
Section: The Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ProNet [36] uses distance measures to determine the similarity between classification tasks and sample prototypes. In the training of the meta-task, the support set samples are used to generate feature vectors through the feature extractor f φ (•), where φ represents the model parameters.…”
Section: The Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To better evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed method in few-shot tasks, we compare the proposed ASMN with several basic methods: traditional supervised learning: CNN, ResNet [38], deep neural network based on domain adaptation in fault diagnosis (DAFD) [39], meta-learning ProNet [36], semi-supervised SSMN [33]. Table 3 lists the details of the comparison methods.…”
Section: Experiments Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, the introduction of meta-learning has simultaneously tackled the challenges of data scarcity and cross-domain, leading to satisfactory results in handling FSFD tasks [11]. Current applications in fault diagnosis are mainly in the areas of parameter optimization [12,13], similarity metrics [14][15][16], and modelbased [17] methods. Among them, the metric-based methods are widely adopted because of their stronger generalization capability and portability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%