2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.07.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prior Cancer in Patients with Ischemic Stroke: The Bergen NORSTROKE Study

Abstract: The prevalence of prior cancer is higher in ISP than in the general population. ISPs with prior cancer are more prone to cardioembolism.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
47
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
(174 reference statements)
5
47
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Also contradictory results have been published on the distribution of traditional stroke risk factors. 13,14 We found associations between heavy drinking, smoking, age >40 years, and poststroke cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Also contradictory results have been published on the distribution of traditional stroke risk factors. 13,14 We found associations between heavy drinking, smoking, age >40 years, and poststroke cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…[14][15][16] With this background, our study on consecutive and well-characterized patient population with first-ever ischemic stroke is unique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A recent prospective study also emphasizes the role of cancer activity in vascular profile distinction between cancer and non-cancer patients. 15 On the other hand, another recent study, The Bergen NORSTROKE Study 16 identified that patients with ischemic stroke and a previous history of cancer had a higher frequency of specific vascular risk factors (atrial fibrillation, heart disease and smoking), highlighting the fact that cancer and stroke have common risk factors. In our series of patients, there were no differences concerning vascular profile between active and non-active cancer patients, which could be explained by the limited number of patients with an active malignancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%