2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12900-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Printable magnesium ion quasi-solid-state asymmetric supercapacitors for flexible solar-charging integrated units

Abstract: Wearable and portable self-powered units have stimulated considerable attention in both the scientific and technological realms. However, their innovative development is still limited by inefficient bulky connections between functional modules, incompatible energy storage systems with poor cycling stability, and real safety concerns. Herein, we demonstrate a flexible solar-charging integrated unit based on the design of printed magnesium ion aqueous asymmetric supercapacitors. This power unit exhibits excellen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
94
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
94
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the most recent reported results, we enhanced the performance by 15% while reducing the device thickness to 1/8, through integrating flexible OPVs with a CNT/polymer‐based supercapacitor on a 1‐µm‐thick ultrathin substrate ( Table 1 ; Figure S13, Supporting Information). [ 21 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with the most recent reported results, we enhanced the performance by 15% while reducing the device thickness to 1/8, through integrating flexible OPVs with a CNT/polymer‐based supercapacitor on a 1‐µm‐thick ultrathin substrate ( Table 1 ; Figure S13, Supporting Information). [ 21 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the calculation could explain some results in the literature, such as the poor performance of systems that have a low total efficiency despite utilizing high‐efficiency solar cells, and systems that show a huge deviation (over 100%) of the highest total efficiencies under different light illuminations, as the highest point varies with time even for the same device. [ 21 ] To address the concerns of the slight difference in calculation, we have calculated the total efficiency from one of the discharge curves after photo‐charging for 600 s at 50% light illumination (with a highest total efficiency of 5.91% at 533 s in the profile) (Figure S15, Supporting Information). The total efficiency of the calculated value based on the real‐time voltage (charge energy) is 5.61% on the profile at 0.734 V in Figure 4d.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations