2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1886445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Print or Perish? Authors’ Attitudes Toward Electronic-Only Publication of Law Journals

Abstract: An increasing number of U.S. law journals post at least current issues in freely accessible PDF and (in some cases) HTML formats on their web sites. Yet, perhaps without exception, the journals that make their articles freely available on their websites also continue to publish print issues in the face of declining subscription numbers, and law libraries" growing disinterest in collecting and preserving journals in print. As universities reduce staff, freeze open positions, eliminate salary increases, and cut … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reluctance to take the plunge into electronic-only publishing may stem from at least two different worries: Some scholars prefer print or hybrid journals because they perceive that electronic-only journals have lower credibility and lower prestige, and some are concerned that journals without any print component might not be adequately preserved and archived (Danner, Kolev, & Most, 2011, pp. 10-11).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reluctance to take the plunge into electronic-only publishing may stem from at least two different worries: Some scholars prefer print or hybrid journals because they perceive that electronic-only journals have lower credibility and lower prestige, and some are concerned that journals without any print component might not be adequately preserved and archived (Danner, Kolev, & Most, 2011, pp. 10-11).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few authors are willing to risk submitting materials to a journal without a track record, because the journal might not be viable (this is especially true with the proliferation of ''Web only'' publications). 67 Although there is a track record (albeit uneven) for its previous incarnations (as Alternative Health Practitioner and Complementary Health Practice Review), JEBCAM itself is new and must establish its own identity. The initial step to overcome this shortcoming has been for JEBCAM to publish on time journal issues consisting mostly of a series of high-quality topical review articles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%