2011
DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enr044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Print Exposure, Reading Habits, and Reading Achievement Among Deaf and Hearing College Students

Abstract: This study explored relations of print exposure, academic achievement, and reading habits among 100 deaf and 100 hearing college students. As in earlier studies, recognition tests for book titles and magazine titles were used as measures of print exposure, college entrance test scores were used as measures of academic achievement, and students provided self-reports of reading habits. Deaf students recognized fewer magazine titles and fewer book titles appropriate for reading levels from kindergarten through Gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reading books has been established as a strong predictor of reading outcomes for children with normal hearing (Stanovich, 1986). One study has examined the effects of the reading habits of adult university students with CIs (Marschark et al, 2012), but the authors are unaware of previous investigations of this factor in children with CIs. Cognitive ability was the only other significant predictor for Oral Language, and is a well-established predictor of language outcomes (Geers et al, 2009;Sarant et al, 2009).…”
Section: Oral Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reading books has been established as a strong predictor of reading outcomes for children with normal hearing (Stanovich, 1986). One study has examined the effects of the reading habits of adult university students with CIs (Marschark et al, 2012), but the authors are unaware of previous investigations of this factor in children with CIs. Cognitive ability was the only other significant predictor for Oral Language, and is a well-established predictor of language outcomes (Geers et al, 2009;Sarant et al, 2009).…”
Section: Oral Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies report that subsets of DHH children are closing the gap to NH children, especially those in their younger school age who have been identified early, receive early auditory stimulation by means of a cochlear implant (CI), and are placed in educational settings among hearing peers (Easterbrooks & Beal‐Alvarez, ). Other studies state that DHH adolescents do not reach reading levels adequate for their age regardless the degree of HL or whether they utilize CI (Marschark et al ., ; Traxler, ), and that they are less accurate in monitoring their own comprehension, regardless of communication mode (Marschark, Sarchet, Convertino, Borgna, Morrison & Remelt, ). Thus, the diverse picture of how DHH children of different ages learn to read, and use reading to learn, makes it important to find methods that promote a good start into reading proficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ability may be particularly important for those who have restricted access to conversation, due either to social isolation or functional impairment. However, these individuals may have difficulty learning to read (Bonvillian et al, 1973;Marschark et al, 2012;Moores, 2013). Reading requires decoding and language comprehension (Haenggi & Perfetti, 1992;Just & Carpenter, 1992;Hulme & Snowling, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%