2014
DOI: 10.5951/mathteacher.107.9.0656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principles to Actions: Mathematics Programs as the Core for Student Learning

Abstract: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) launched the “standards-based” education movement in North America in 1989 with the release of Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics, an unprecedented action to promote systemic improvement in mathematics education. Now, twenty-five years later, the widespread adoption of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM) by forty-five states provides an opportunity to reenergize and focus our commitment to significant improvement… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such questions aid in building bridges of understanding and fruitful mutual cooperation between teachers and their students. Examples of such questions for teaching and learning calculus are presented in http://math.colorado.edu/activecalc/ Kress (2017) explicates 6 educational questions that are basic when dealing with complex math problems (NCTM, 2014;Brahier et al, 2014), and are in sync with active learning principles (Webb, 2016). These 6 questions are different from those designed by Polya (1945), but they adhere to the same approach in solving problems.…”
Section: Impact Of Questions In Teaching and Learning Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such questions aid in building bridges of understanding and fruitful mutual cooperation between teachers and their students. Examples of such questions for teaching and learning calculus are presented in http://math.colorado.edu/activecalc/ Kress (2017) explicates 6 educational questions that are basic when dealing with complex math problems (NCTM, 2014;Brahier et al, 2014), and are in sync with active learning principles (Webb, 2016). These 6 questions are different from those designed by Polya (1945), but they adhere to the same approach in solving problems.…”
Section: Impact Of Questions In Teaching and Learning Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More often than not, asking and answering questions is interconnected with the train of students" thoughts and their insight into the problem. Clear-cut and well thought-out questions assist in assessing and developing students" reasoning capabilities, they help learners grasp math ideas and establish relationships between math concepts (Brahier et al, 2014;NCTM, 2014). It is necessary for the teachers to understand the importance of "Good Question-asking Skills" in mathematics lessons (Sullivan, & Lilburn, 2002).…”
Section: Impact Of Questions In Teaching and Learning Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional mathematics classroom approaches normally do not engage students in critical thinking and establish a community of learners for change and progress; there was a lack of critical pedagogy (Freire, 1970) as cited in (Apple, 2011). Brahier et al (2014) believe a mathematics classroom should stimulate interaction, idea-sharing, and problem-solving. Teachers may require a social justice lens to teach arithmetic.…”
Section: How Do You See Individual Differences?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new math that woefully failed in the US was primarily criticized for being developed by only experts without much involvement from the subject teachers [24]. It is worthy to note that since the council of mathematics teachers was instituted to take charge of curriculum issues, the transitions have been smooth and efficient [25,26]. Mereku [18] alerted that the modern mathematics introduced in Ghana in the 1987 reform came with high expectations but failed because the concept design was by psychologists without incorporating teachers' views of the subject.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%