Principles of the International Commission on Radiological Protection system of dose limitation

Abstract

The current recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), published in 1977, identify two types of effect against which protection is required. "Stochastic" effects are those for which the probability of an effect occurring, rather than its severity, is regarded as a function of dose without threshold, whereas "non-stochastic" effects are those for which the severity varies with the dose and for which a threshold may occur. The system of dose limitation recommended by the ICRP is based on the prevention of non-stochastic effects and limitation of the probability of stochastic effects to levels deemed to be acceptable. The prevention of non-stochastic effects is achieved by setting dose-equivalent limits at values such that no threshold dose would be reached, even following exposure for the whole of a lifetime or for the total period of a working life. The limitation of stochastic effects is achieved by keeping all justifiable exposures as low as is reasonably achievable, economic and social factors being taken into account, subject to the constraint that reductions in collective exposure do not cause unacceptably large individual exposures. The formulation of a quantitative system of dose limitation based on these principles requires that judgments be made on several factors including: relationships between radiation dose and the induction of deleterious effects for a variety of endpoints and radiation types; acceptable levels of risk for radiation workers and members of the public; and methods of assessing whether the cost of introducing protective measures is justified by the reduction in radiation detriment which they will provide. In the case of patients deliberately exposed to ionising radiations, the objectives of radiation protection differ somewhat from those applying to radiation workers and members of the public. For patients, risks and benefits relate to the same person and upper limits on acceptable risks may differ grossly from those appropriate to normal individuals. For these reasons, and because of its historical relationship with the International Congress of Radiology, the ICRP has given special consideration to radiation protection in medicine and has published reports on protection of the patient in diagnostic radiology and in radiation therapy.

Emerging Technologies in Spinal Surgery: Ultra-Low Radiation Imaging Platforms

“…13 Considering that the dose limit per year under which there are no negative consequences to radiation exposure has been reported as 10 mSv, this is an important distinction. 18 More recently, a variety of "micro-dose" protocols for the EOS system have been applied that have been shown to further lower radiation exposure by as much 6 to 7 times compared with the standard EOS modality, or by a factor of 17 to 45 when compared with standard radiography (Figure 3). 19 The 3D reconstructions generated by the system's software have also been found to be highly accurate when compared with the obtained 2-dimensional images, both before and after scoliotic correction surgery, with correlation coefficients of 0.950 and 0.935, respectively.…”

Evaluation of Effective Dose and Associated Radiation Risks in Common Computed Tomography Procedures

“…X-rays are low LET ionising radiation and are considered a carcinogen according to the World Health Organization (2) . Depending on the length of time from the moment of irradiation to the first appearance of symptoms they are classified as early and late effects of radiation.Early effects of radiation are called non-stochastic or deterministic effect as their severity increases with increasing absorbed dose (3) . Stochastic effects of radiation are late effects of radiation that can cause somatic stochastic and genetic damage.…”