2014
DOI: 10.1038/nature13985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principles of regulatory information conservation between mouse and human

Abstract: Summary To broaden our understanding of the evolution of gene regulation mechanisms, we generated occupancy profiles for 34 orthologous transcription factors (TFs) in human-mouse erythroid progenitor, lymphoblast, and embryonic stem cell lines. By combining the genome-wide TF occupancy repertoires, associated epigenetic signals, and TF co-association patterns, we deduced several evolutionary principles of gene regulatory features operating since the mouse and human lineages diverged. The genomic distribution p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

23
263
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(288 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
23
263
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless, we found that even those noncoding transcripts that are highly replicable are not conserved between mice and humans. When the biological function of lincRNAs can be found, they appear to be involved in regulation; our results are consistent with the idea that regulatory information in general, such as transcription factor binding, is highly diverged (22,23). Overall, our study demonstrates the extensive divergence in the expression of both noncoding genes as well as conserved, protein-coding genes that likely mediates the extensive differences between humans and mice.…”
Section: Histone Mark Differences For Differentially Expressed Genessupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Regardless, we found that even those noncoding transcripts that are highly replicable are not conserved between mice and humans. When the biological function of lincRNAs can be found, they appear to be involved in regulation; our results are consistent with the idea that regulatory information in general, such as transcription factor binding, is highly diverged (22,23). Overall, our study demonstrates the extensive divergence in the expression of both noncoding genes as well as conserved, protein-coding genes that likely mediates the extensive differences between humans and mice.…”
Section: Histone Mark Differences For Differentially Expressed Genessupporting
confidence: 78%
“…We first enumerated all CREs occupied by GATA1 in primary human EBs that are proximal to the ∼20 known pathogenic MED genes. Within these CREs, we identified 176 core GATA sites, and investigated the evolutionary conservation of these four nucleotides as a proxy for functionality (32,44,47,48). Surprisingly, although we observed only slight conservation for the GATA site within all ∼20,000 GATA1 chromatin occupancy sites across the genome, GATA sites within MED CREs were substantially conserved (Fig.…”
Section: Isogenic Cellular Models Phenocopy Cell-intrinsic Effects Ofmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…3D) (40). (9,44,47,48). This suggests the possibility that an important minority of causal genetic lesions may instead be located within NC regulatory regions.…”
Section: Isogenic Cellular Models Phenocopy Cell-intrinsic Effects Ofmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…10 Recent analysis of DNase I hypersensitive sites and occupancy profiles of transcription-factor binding in humans and mice suggests the preservation of similar regulatory mechanisms for adipose gene expression in both species, and this preservation could be leveraged to inform disease pathways. 23,24 We describe here the analysis of gene expression in 770 subcutaneous adipose samples from Metabolic Syndrome in Men (METSIM), a study of 10,197 men, 45-73 years of age, living in the Kuopio area of Finland. Study data include dense genotypes and extensive metabolic and cardiovascular traits, such as plasma lipids, inflammatory markers, glycemic traits, and anthropometric traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%