2011
DOI: 10.1159/000329997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principles of Psychosomatic Assessment

Abstract: There is increasing awareness of the limitations of disease as the primary focus of medical care. It is not that certain disorders lack an organic explanation, but that our assessment is inadequate in most clinical encounters. The primary goal of psychosomatic medicine is to correct this inadequacy by incorporation of its operational strategies into clinical practice. At present, the research evidence which has accumulated in psychosomatic medicine offers unprecedented opportunities for the identification and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Psychosomatic assessment and treatment of medical comorbidities is relevant in depression in general [57,58,59], but may be more important in some subtypes than others [26,60]. Our findings indicate that clinicians should be particularly attentive to medical morbidity, in patients with non-psychotic severe depression, and emphasize the importance of clinically relevant subtypes of the highly heterogeneous depressive syndrome [26,61,62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Psychosomatic assessment and treatment of medical comorbidities is relevant in depression in general [57,58,59], but may be more important in some subtypes than others [26,60]. Our findings indicate that clinicians should be particularly attentive to medical morbidity, in patients with non-psychotic severe depression, and emphasize the importance of clinically relevant subtypes of the highly heterogeneous depressive syndrome [26,61,62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…On the other hand, in the medical setting, the traditional biomedical disease model cannot explain how recognition, presentation, and outcome of a disease may be largely influenced by individual responses to symptoms [11] . Many years ago, Feinstein [68] already urged clini-cians to develop alternative intellectual models to study the clinical phenomena directly, to specify the importance of different types of clinical data, and to create appropriate systems of taxonomy for classifying the information that would articulate the clinical process and use the results for quantified analyses for enhancing the process of clinical decision making.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…material, see www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/000430788). The DCPR rationale was to expand the traditional domains of the disease model by translating psychosocial variables that derived from psychosomatic research into operational tools [10,11] . The DCPR are a set of 12 psychosomatic syndromes whose prognostic role in the development, course, and outcome of physical diseases, regardless of their 'organic' or 'functional' nature, was documented by a large body of literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emmelkamp et al (84) have introduced the concept of macro-analysis (a relationship between co-occurring syndromes and problems is established on the basis of where treatment should commence in the fi rst place) in anxiety disorders. This method has been extended to mood disorders (56), psychosomatic assessment (85) and drug dependence (86). Macro-analysis starts from the assumption that in most cases there are functional relationships with other more or less clearly defi ned problem areas and that the targets of treatment may vary during the course of disturbances (56).…”
Section: Macro-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%