Proceedings of Applied Power Electronics Conference. APEC '96
DOI: 10.1109/apec.1996.500416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principles of fault tolerance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We define the robustness of a circuit as the fraction of its neighbours that are neutral neighbours. This quantity is an analogue of mutational robustness in biological systems [1,15], as well as of fault-tolerance in engineering [46,47]. Figure 3a shows that the robustness of circuits computing different functions is generally high.…”
Section: Larger Circuits Are More Robust To Configuration Changes Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We define the robustness of a circuit as the fraction of its neighbours that are neutral neighbours. This quantity is an analogue of mutational robustness in biological systems [1,15], as well as of fault-tolerance in engineering [46,47]. Figure 3a shows that the robustness of circuits computing different functions is generally high.…”
Section: Larger Circuits Are More Robust To Configuration Changes Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that beyond incorporating redundancy in the design, appropriate fault detection, isolation and reconfiguration mechanisms are equally important to achieve fault-tolerant operation. The interested reader is referred to [13] for a discussion of the principles related to fault tolerance.…”
Section: Fault Tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, conventional PM machines are claimed to have inferior fault tolerance compared with SR machines (Argile, 2008;Mecrow et al, 1996;White, 1996). Conventional PM generators are intolerant to elevated temperatures.…”
Section: Permanent Generatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These machines are designed with a high number of phases, such that the machine can continue to deliver a satisfactory level of torque/power after a fault in one or more phases. Furthermore, each phase has minimal electrical, magnetic, and thermal impact upon the others (Argile, 2008;Jack et al, 1996;Jones & Drager, 1997;Mecrow et al, 1996;Mitcham & Cullenm, 2002, 2005White, 1996). This is realised by:…”
Section: Permanent Generatormentioning
confidence: 99%