2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.03.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principles of analytical calibration/quantification for the separation sciences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
71
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the tolerance intervals are narrower and better centered around the 0% of total error line when the internal standard is used: it reduces the total error of the measurement and improves the performance of the analytical procedure. These results confirm the observations of Demeestere et al, Su et al, and Cuadros-Rodriguez et al [38][39][40]. Therefore, the internal standard was used for routine analysis.…”
Section: Accuracy Profilesupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the tolerance intervals are narrower and better centered around the 0% of total error line when the internal standard is used: it reduces the total error of the measurement and improves the performance of the analytical procedure. These results confirm the observations of Demeestere et al, Su et al, and Cuadros-Rodriguez et al [38][39][40]. Therefore, the internal standard was used for routine analysis.…”
Section: Accuracy Profilesupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Quantification of field samples was conducted by the internal standard mode, as suggested by several authors, in order to compensate for measurement uncertainties during analysis [38][39][40]. n-Butyl-benzene was chosen as the internal standard for monoterpene analysis [30].…”
Section: Td-gc-ms Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EC is adequate for analytical procedures that could be considered as methods free from matrix effects, but it has the main limitation coming from the assumption that the different environments (matrices) of the calibration standards (solvent, buffer,…) and of the samples are equivalent, and they have no effect on the calibration function [21]. If this assumption is incorrect, additive and/or proportional systematic errors may appear.…”
Section: The External Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is named so because the calibration standards are not made up of the sample test portion. Instead, they are prepared and analysed separately from samples [21]. Accordingly, the signals recorded accounts for the analyte added as primary standard, reagents, solvents and other agents according to the analytical procedure, except the sample matrix.…”
Section: The External Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation