2015
DOI: 10.1109/mis.2015.44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principles for human-centered interaction design, Part 2: Can humans and machines think together?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the receiver, the conventional decoding method and the proposed predictive decoding method were used to reconstruct images based on the received descriptions. Note that our focus is to test the effectiveness of the proposed side decoding in terms of rate-distortion performance, as compared to the conventional side decoding [51] as shown in (4) and (5). We implemented both the algorithms with the sublattice index number N = 31.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the receiver, the conventional decoding method and the proposed predictive decoding method were used to reconstruct images based on the received descriptions. Note that our focus is to test the effectiveness of the proposed side decoding in terms of rate-distortion performance, as compared to the conventional side decoding [51] as shown in (4) and (5). We implemented both the algorithms with the sublattice index number N = 31.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, after a first moment of doubt, most users started balancing pros and cons of current situation and the proposed one and considered the optimisation of time and resources that a DDVA would have for them resulted on a more positive perceived customer care relationship; (ii) Secondly, users also would like to have a backup person to talk to when the DDVA is not able to solve their problem, following the Human In-The-Loop practice [18]. These findings point out to the fact that people do not consider the DDVA will satisfy all their requests, and consider that they would not remain unsolved when combining human and AI forces [25]. This led to a higher level of satisfaction of the DDVA concept proposed, while establishing a potential scenario to merge both worlds in order to enhance customer service and strengthen the value proposition.…”
Section: Transferring Human Roles To Aimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the AI systems need autonomy to perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of users, it becomes essential to develop trust on the AI actions in order to use them and adopt them as assistants in people's daily lives [21]. Currently, a human is always there controlling cases of doubt or ambiguity, for no machine is perfect, as no human is [22], so there is no need to separate AI from humans, since various trials such as with Centaur Chess [23] and IBM Watson [24] proved that human minds and machines work better together than separately [25].…”
Section: Mistrusting Ai To Solve Complex Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%