Principles and Concepts of DNA Replication in Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya

O'Donnell, Mike; Langston, Lance D.; Stillman, Bruce

doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a010108

Cited by 283 publications

(280 citation statements)

References 59 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

262

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…DNA polymerase III (pol III) is the replicative DNA polymerase in E. coli 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11. It is an asymmetric dimer or trimer that synthesizes the leading and lagging strands simultaneously at the replication fork 6, 7, 12.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Single‐molecule mechanochemical characterization of E. coli pol III core catalytic activity

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pol III core is the three‐subunit subassembly of the E. coli replicative DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. It contains the catalytic polymerase subunit α, the 3′ → 5′ proofreading exonuclease ε, and a subunit of unknown function, θ. We employ optical tweezers to characterize pol III core activity on a single DNA substrate. We observe polymerization at applied template forces F < 25 pN and exonucleolysis at F > 30 pN. Both polymerization and exonucleolysis occur as a series of short bursts separated by pauses. For polymerization, the initiation rate after pausing is independent of force. In contrast, the exonucleolysis initiation rate depends strongly on force. The measured force and concentration dependence of exonucleolysis initiation fits well to a two‐step reaction scheme in which pol III core binds bimolecularly to the primer‐template junction, then converts at rate k 2 into an exo‐competent conformation. Fits to the force dependence of k init show that exo initiation requires fluctuational opening of two base pairs, in agreement with temperature‐ and mismatch‐dependent bulk biochemical assays. Taken together, our results support a model in which the pol and exo activities of pol III core are effectively independent, and in which recognition of the 3′ end of the primer by either α or ε is governed by the primer stability. Thus, binding to an unstable primer is the primary mechanism for mismatch recognition during proofreading, rather than an alternative model of duplex defect recognition.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Single‐molecule mechanochemical characterization of E. coli pol III core catalytic activity

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Unlike other replicative helicases, the eukaryotic replicative Mcm2-7 helicase is composed of six nonidentical but homologous Mcm subunits that become activated upon assembly with five accessory factors (Cdc45 and GINS tetramer) to form the 11-subunit CMG (Cdc45, Mcm2-7, GINS) (4)(5)(6). Numerous studies have outlined the process that forms CMG at origins in which the Mcm2-7 heterohexamer is loaded onto DNA as an inactive double hexamer in G1 phase, and becomes activated in S phase by several initiation proteins and cell-cycle kinases that assemble Cdc45 and GINS onto Mcm2-7 to form the active CMG helicases (7)(8)(9).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Structure of eukaryotic CMG helicase at a replication fork and implications to replisome architecture and origin initiation

Georgescu

Yuan

Bai

et al. 2017

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

182

299

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The eukaryotic CMG (Cdc45, Mcm2-7, GINS) helicase consists of the Mcm2-7 hexameric ring along with five accessory factors. The Mcm2-7 heterohexamer, like other hexameric helicases, is shaped like a ring with two tiers, an N-tier ring composed of the N-terminal domains, and a C-tier of C-terminal domains; the C-tier contains the motor. In principle, either tier could translocate ahead of the other during movement on DNA. We have used cryo-EM single-particle 3D reconstruction to solve the structure of CMG in complex with a DNA fork. The duplex stem penetrates into the central channel of the N-tier and the unwound leading single-strand DNA traverses the channel through the N-tier into the C-tier motor, 5′-3′ through CMG. Therefore, the N-tier ring is pushed ahead by the C-tier ring during CMG translocation, opposite the currently accepted polarity. The polarity of the N-tier ahead of the C-tier places the leading Pol e below CMG and Pol α-primase at the top of CMG at the replication fork. Surprisingly, the new N-tier to C-tier polarity of translocation reveals an unforeseen quality-control mechanism at the origin. Thus, upon assembly of head-to-head CMGs that encircle doublestranded DNA at the origin, the two CMGs must pass one another to leave the origin and both must remodel onto opposite strands of single-stranded DNA to do so. We propose that head-to-head motors may generate energy that underlies initial melting at the origin.CMG helicase | DNA replication | DNA polymerase | origin initiation | replisome R eplicative helicases are hexameric rings in all domains of life (1-3). In bacteria and archaea, the replicative helicase is a homohexamer and encircles single-strand (ss) DNA at a replication fork. Some viral and phage replicative helicases are also ring-shaped hexamers, including bovine papilloma virus (BPV) E1, simian virus 40 (SV40) large T-antigen (T-Ag), and the T4 and T7 phage helicases. Unlike other replicative helicases, the eukaryotic replicative Mcm2-7 helicase is composed of six nonidentical but homologous Mcm subunits that become activated upon assembly with five accessory factors (Cdc45 and GINS tetramer) to form the 11-subunit CMG (Cdc45, Mcm2-7, GINS) (4-6). Numerous studies have outlined the process that forms CMG at origins in which the Mcm2-7 heterohexamer is loaded onto DNA as an inactive double hexamer in G1 phase, and becomes activated in S phase by several initiation proteins and cell-cycle kinases that assemble Cdc45 and GINS onto Mcm2-7 to form the active CMG helicases (7-9).Helicases assort into six superfamilies (SF1-SF6) based on sequence alignments (10). The SF1 and SF2 helicases are generally monomeric and the SF3-SF6 helicases are hexameric rings used in DNA replication and other processes. The bacterial SF4 and SF5 helicases contain RecA-based motors and translocate 5′-3′, whereas the eukarytic SF3 and SF6 helicases contain AAA+ (ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities)-based motors and translocate 3′-5′ (3, 10). Examples of well-studied hexameric helicases include t...

show abstract

“…Eukaryotes possess several replisome factors that have no homologs in bacteria, and also require two different DNA polymerases for bulk leading and lagging strand synthesis, and Escherichia coli and its phages use identical copies of a DNA polymerase for both strands of the duplex (4). Thus far, the evolutionary purpose behind the additional complexity in eukaryotes is unclear.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality control mechanisms exclude incorrect polymerases from the eukaryotic replication fork

Schauer

O'Donnell

2017

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The eukaryotic genome is primarily replicated by two DNA polymerases, Pol e and Pol δ, that function on the leading and lagging strands, respectively. Previous studies have established recruitment mechanisms whereby Cdc45-Mcm2-7-GINS (CMG) helicase binds Pol e and tethers it to the leading strand, and PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) binds tightly to Pol δ and recruits it to the lagging strand. The current report identifies quality control mechanisms that exclude the improper polymerase from a particular strand. We find that the replication factor C (RFC) clamp loader specifically inhibits Pol e on the lagging strand, and CMG protects Pol e against RFC inhibition on the leading strand. Previous studies show that Pol δ is slow and distributive with CMG on the leading strand. However, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pol δ-PCNA is a rapid and processive enzyme, suggesting that CMG may bind and alter Pol δ activity or position it on the lagging strand. Measurements of polymerase binding to CMG demonstrate Pol e binds CMG with a K d value of 12 nM, but Pol δ binding CMG is undetectable. Pol δ, like bacterial replicases, undergoes collision release upon completing replication, and we propose Pol δ-PCNA collides with the slower CMG, and in the absence of a stabilizing Pol δ-CMG interaction, the collision release process is triggered, ejecting Pol δ on the leading strand. Hence, by eviction of incorrect polymerases at the fork, the clamp machinery directs quality control on the lagging strand and CMG enforces quality control on the leading strand.D uplication of genetic material is performed by a dynamic interplay of numerous different proteins, collectively referred to as the replisome, that orchestrate their actions to accomplish efficient, high-fidelity replication of both the leading and lagging strands (1-3). Eukaryotes possess several replisome factors that have no homologs in bacteria, and also require two different DNA polymerases for bulk leading and lagging strand synthesis, and Escherichia coli and its phages use identical copies of a DNA polymerase for both strands of the duplex (4). Thus far, the evolutionary purpose behind the additional complexity in eukaryotes is unclear.At the heart of the eukaryotic replisome is an 11-subunit helicase complex referred to as CMG (Cdc45-Mcm2-7-GINS) (5-7). Eukaryotes use three different multisubunit B-family DNA polymerases (Pol) for replication. Pol e and Pol δ copy the bulk of the genome, and Pol α-primase generates hybrid RNA-DNA primers of about 25 nucleotides and, unlike Pol e and Pol δ, it lacks 3′-5′ exonuclease (proofreading) activity. The replication factor C (RFC) clamp loader is used to load PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) clamps onto primed sites that endow the replicative polymerases with high processivity (8). The replication protein A (RPA) heterotrimer binds and protects the single-strand (ss) DNA of the lagging strand against nucleases, and helps melt secondary structure in ssDNA. Reconstitution of the core eukaryotic replisome using all thre...

show abstract

Principles and Concepts of DNA Replication in Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya

Cited by 283 publications

References 59 publications

Single‐molecule mechanochemical characterization of E. coli pol III core catalytic activity

Single‐molecule mechanochemical characterization of E. coli pol III core catalytic activity

Structure of eukaryotic CMG helicase at a replication fork and implications to replisome architecture and origin initiation

Quality control mechanisms exclude incorrect polymerases from the eukaryotic replication fork

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About