Principals' value‐informed decision making, intrapersonal moral discord, and pathways to resolution

Abstract

PurposeThis research seeks to explore the inevitable internal struggle experienced by school leaders when making ethically‐informed judgments. The study acquired principals' intimate reflections about professional decision making in response to personal versus organizational and/or professional value discrepancy as identified in the ethic of the profession and its model for promoting students' best interests.Design/methodology/approachA modified phenomenological research method, appropriate for an educational research context, was used to capture administrators' perspectives about moral practice and decision‐making experiences. The primary data collection strategy was participant interviews by means of purposeful sampling.FindingsA clash between personal beliefs and values and organizational/professional expectations was very real for participants. The experience was generally frequent, but varied among principals. The struggle can be characterized as a phenomenon of intrapersonal moral discord experienced as part of the process of deciding ethically when faced with difficult moral choices.Practical implicationsThe study contributes to the understanding of moral conflict in school leadership as an intrapersonal moral phenomenon, and how the conflict is resolved in practice, while providing insights into a more recently defined and theorized professional ethic for educational leadership. The study offers empirically derived knowledge for theory building and offers conceptual clarification of the moral leadership construct.Originality/valueMoral judgment was complicated and contextually defined for participants. Administrators reported various ways of dealing with the nuances of personal and organizational value incongruity in order to engage in ethical decision making, including relying on, in some instances, a fundamental professional injunction.

Factors influencing decision‐making around family presence during resuscitation: a grounded theory study

“…People involved in a resuscitation event made a series of value‐laden judgements to determine the level of FPDR implemented. We noted Frick's (, p. 51) definition of values as: ‘motivated preferences [or] conceptions of what is desirable, in personal or collective terms, that influences the selection of available modes, means and ends of action.’ Consequently, we defined value‐laden judgements as decisions that were influenced by a person's inherent beliefs and preferences and the extent to which they valued FPDR.…”

Practicing a Professional Ethic: Leading for Students’ Best Interests

“…Using ethical rules of thumb in decision making (Frick 2009) appears to be a dominant practice, but the "best interests" expression is in nowise privileged. Sometimes the phrase was used as a formal maxim, while more often the saying was weighed with a variety of other concerns and considerations, obligations to organizational rules and policies, and situational and contextual variables, in order to determine what value, or set of values, takes precedence while seeking to meet both individual and collective student needs.…”

A Decision-Making Model for Promoting Social Justice Through the Ethic of Justice, Ethic of Care, and the Ethic of Grace

“…The decision-making process timeframe of a school principal can vary widely, from a few seconds when dealing with students, to days as necessary information is gathered for strategic decisionmaking. The process of decision-making in the school house is dynamic and everchanging and has been described as consisting of far more than the mechanical application of existing rules, regulations, and various levels of school-related policy (Frick, 2009). Principals operate within a dense legal, political, and social environment, and they are subject to municipal, state, and federal laws and regulations.…”