2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00526-022-02386-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principal spectral curves for Lane–Emden fully nonlinear type systems and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then we choose small enough such that . Since on , then by the maximum principle for the Lane-Emden system for fully nonlinear operators with weights in [13] we get in . Since then in , but this contradicts the fact that . Case 1: …”
Section: Existence Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Then we choose small enough such that . Since on , then by the maximum principle for the Lane-Emden system for fully nonlinear operators with weights in [13] we get in . Since then in , but this contradicts the fact that . Case 1: …”
Section: Existence Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If has a fixed point then and solve with in , where Now, the definition of first eigenvalue for the fully nonlinear weighted Lane-Emden system in [13] yields Thus we choose large enough such that in order to derive a contradiction.…”
Section: Existence Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let us fix the operator M + , since for M − it is analogous. The solvability of the sublinear PDE in the annulus a consequence of Theorem 1.16 in [15] with p = q, since in the annulus the weights are bounded, so integrable in any Lebesgue space. We give a proof of this fact for reader's convenience.…”
Section: Liliane Maia Gabrielle Nornberg and Filomena Pacellamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observe that the moving planes method cannot be applied in the annulus to obtain symmetry in the lack of convexity of the domain. We mention that existence of a positive annular solution (not necessarily radial) of (1), (3) follows by [18], since in this case we have a bounded weight; while uniqueness comes for instance from [15]. However, knowing that the solution obtained is radial turns out to be a consequence of the dynamical system approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%