2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.08.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: II. Adequacy of low-density estimates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
203
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
203
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like microstate segmentation, PCA is essentially an exploratory and descriptive method for summarizing complex, multi-channel ERP data sets by reducing their temporal and/or spatial dimensions. Thus, PCA can provide useful insight into how ERPs components are affected by the experimental manipulations (see [61,62] for description of the PCA analysis; see [63][64][65][66][67] for additional technical details). Without any a priori assumptions about the shape or number of components in the data set, the PCA will determine the complex relationships between a large number of dependent variables (i.e., the voltage at each time frame for a temporal PCA and the voltage at each electrode for a spatial PCA) and summarize these relations in terms of unobserved dependent variables (what is usually called temporal or spatial factor in a PCA), corresponding to the recorded components.…”
Section: General Principles Of Pcamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Like microstate segmentation, PCA is essentially an exploratory and descriptive method for summarizing complex, multi-channel ERP data sets by reducing their temporal and/or spatial dimensions. Thus, PCA can provide useful insight into how ERPs components are affected by the experimental manipulations (see [61,62] for description of the PCA analysis; see [63][64][65][66][67] for additional technical details). Without any a priori assumptions about the shape or number of components in the data set, the PCA will determine the complex relationships between a large number of dependent variables (i.e., the voltage at each time frame for a temporal PCA and the voltage at each electrode for a spatial PCA) and summarize these relations in terms of unobserved dependent variables (what is usually called temporal or spatial factor in a PCA), corresponding to the recorded components.…”
Section: General Principles Of Pcamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, PCA provides a measure of the contribution of each factor to the observed ERPs, and allows subsequent tests to determine any statistical difference between conditions. The application of PCA is not limited to ERPs and can also concern raw EEG epochs (e.g., [68]), serve as a method to efficiently filter the data (e.g., ocular artefact; [69]), or be used for specific source localization purposes [66,67].…”
Section: General Principles Of Pcamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tPCA enables temporally overlapping components to be separated (Dien & Frishkoff, 2005). The combination of a Laplacian filter and tPCA has been described in depth by Kayser and Tenke (2006). A scree test was used to select from among the eight temporal factors (TFs) extracted using the covariance matrix (Promax rotation).…”
Section: Offline Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An independent component analysis algorithm was applied to remove components related to ocular artifacts. We also performed a current source density transformation based on the spherical-spline surface Laplacian, using the MATLAB code provided by Kayser and Tenke (2006) (smoothing constant = 10…”
Section: Offline Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trade-off between noise attenuation and loss of spatial resolution in low-density arrays was discussed by Tenke et al (1993). In fact, lower-density estimates has proven to be quite useful more than once, as described by Kayser and Tenke (2006a) in the context of ERP analysis. Finally, we point out that evidence for electrode bridges in high-density EEG recordings was identified as a problem caused typically by electrolyte spreading between nearby electrodes (Tenke and Kayser, 2001;Greischar et al, 2004;Alschuler et al, 2014).…”
Section: Finite Difference Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%