2019
DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2019.2923724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principal Component Regression on Motor Evoked Potential in Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Abstract: Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are commonly characterized only by their onset (latency) and size (amplitude) whereas other potentially important information in the MEPs is discarded. Hence, our aim was to examine the morphological information of MEPs using principal component regression (PCR) providing additional perception of MEPs. MEPs were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle following navigated TMS focused at the primary motor cortex. The PCR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One might be tempted to use simpler metrics than ApEn to quantify the abnormality of the morphology. A different metric could be counting the number of peaks (or, equivalently, the number of zero-line crossings) to count the number of phases (Nguyen et al, 2019 ). This works less well: the number of peaks feature has AUC = 0.76 on average on the 1-votes of the training set, compared to AUC = 0.92 for ApEn.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One might be tempted to use simpler metrics than ApEn to quantify the abnormality of the morphology. A different metric could be counting the number of peaks (or, equivalently, the number of zero-line crossings) to count the number of phases (Nguyen et al, 2019 ). This works less well: the number of peaks feature has AUC = 0.76 on average on the 1-votes of the training set, compared to AUC = 0.92 for ApEn.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To significantly lower their dimensionality and to capture their salient information, evoked potential time series (EPTS) are often condensed into a single EP score (Schlaeger et al, 2016 ). Recent work has also investigated in reducing the dimensionality of an EP by using principal component regression (Nguyen et al, 2019 ). The EP score is a composite score, for which three variables are commonly extracted from the EPTS: latency, amplitude, and presence of morphological abnormality (Schlaeger et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, all mentioned algorithms (AHTE and SM) give a relatively accurate estimation of the MEP signal latency with higher PTP amplitudes (exceeding 100 µV). However, a lower estimation (precision) rate is documented for the latency of the MEP signals with lower PTP amplitudes (i.e., lower than 100 µV) [18][19][20][21][22]. Therefore, there is a need for a better algorithm that will improve the latency estimation of MEP signals with lower PTP amplitudes.…”
Section: B Algorithms Based On Statistical Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, MEPs are interpreted concerning the performance of actions (resting-state vs. execution); secondly, to probe the physiology of the motor cortex (i.e., pharmacological manipulations or investigation of cortical excitability in the context of psychiatric or neurological illnesses) and thirdly, to probe the physiology that occurs outside of the M1. The amplitude and the latency of the MEP signal are the most used features for quantifying MEP signals [17] - [19]. Although the MEP amplitude varies significantly in patients with pathologies, as well as in healthy subjects [18], [20] - [22], the peak-to-peak (PTP) amplitude defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum value of the MEP response, represents an accurate indicator for estimating the MEP amplitude oscillation [23]- [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the correlation between main and quality variables has not been considered. Then, an external analysis-based regression model [33] was constructed for robust soft sensing, in which principal component regression (PCR) [34], [35] and PLS were employed to construct the regression model. Remarkably, in reference [33], the corresponding nonlinear tools were introduced to resolve the nonlinear relationships although they were not described in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%