2009
DOI: 10.1002/sam.10031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principal component analysis and dimensional analysis as materials informatics tools to reduce dimensionality in materials science and engineering

Abstract: Abstract:In engineering design, we are constantly faced with the need to describe the behavior of complex engineered systems for which there is no closed-form solution. There is rarely a single multiscale theory or experiment that can meaningfully and accurately capture such information primarily due to the inherently multivariate nature of the variables influencing materials behavior. Seeking structure-property relationships is an accepted paradigm in materials science, yet these relationships are often not l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could include groupings from dimensional analysis (Rajan et al, 2009), simple relational features (Kanter and Veeramachaneni, 2015), PCA (Sieg et al, 2006), or some other method. In all cases, care must be taken to avoid incompatible operations (e.g., do not add an atomic radius to an ionization potential).…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could include groupings from dimensional analysis (Rajan et al, 2009), simple relational features (Kanter and Veeramachaneni, 2015), PCA (Sieg et al, 2006), or some other method. In all cases, care must be taken to avoid incompatible operations (e.g., do not add an atomic radius to an ionization potential).…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soft modeling is based on statistical learning methods to seek heuristic relationships between data (81) and it often uses developed descriptors as well as knowledge extracted through the previous tasks to construct a cheap yet robust model enabling the establishment and deeper understanding of QSAR/QSPR (65). It includes regressions, artificial neural networks, multivariate analysis, and other machine learning algorithms (85). Unlike hard modeling, the predictive soft modeling is particularly valuable when physical/chemical models are not available.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…position in space is described numerically by three scalars x, y and z, whereas a parameter in dimensional analysis is usually understood as a single quantity), which may in practice also lead to an unnecessary increase in the number of new parameters (Madrid & Alhama, 2006). These as well as other drawbacks of dimensional analysis are the reason why method is often aided by other dimensional reduction methods, with statistical methods among the most popular ones (Madrid & Alhama, 2006;Rajan et al, 2009). …”
Section: Further Remarks On the Limitations Of Dimensional Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%