2018
DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwx033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primus inter pares? The French field of power and its power elite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This identifies a group of 423 individuals in which all were within a network reach of at least 199 of the 422 other core members. This core is akin to Mills’ (1956: 18; see also Denord et al, 2018) definition of a power elite as an ‘intricate set of overlapping cliques [that] share[s] decisions having at least national consequences’ and that serves as our empirical approximation of the effective agents on the Danish field of power.…”
Section: Methods: Constructing the Field Of Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This identifies a group of 423 individuals in which all were within a network reach of at least 199 of the 422 other core members. This core is akin to Mills’ (1956: 18; see also Denord et al, 2018) definition of a power elite as an ‘intricate set of overlapping cliques [that] share[s] decisions having at least national consequences’ and that serves as our empirical approximation of the effective agents on the Danish field of power.…”
Section: Methods: Constructing the Field Of Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Danish economy is negotiated by the triumvirate of the state, employer associations and unions that share control over important institutions within the legal system, pension funds, finance, research funding, education and economic policy. Scholars have already supplemented Bourdieu’s (1996) analysis of the field of power in 1970s France by constructing the field of power in Norway (Hjellbrekke et al, 2007) and contemporary France (Denord et al, 2018). While all three analyses identify vertical oppositions between the established and the newcomers in the field of power, Bourdieu’s view of a horizontal split between positions holding economic versus cultural capital appears more specific to the historical and national context of his analysis.…”
Section: Introduction: the Division Of The Labour Of Dominationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCA is closely associated with the work of Pierre Bourdieu as a way to construct and analyse social spaces and fields (Lebaron 2009). Recently, MCA has been used to construct spaces on prosopographical populations such as central bank directors (Lebaron and Dogan 2012), French and Norwegian elites (Denord et al 2018;Hjellbrekke et al 2007) and top Swiss (Bühlmann et al 2012), Indian (Naudet et al 2018), and Danish CEO's (Ellersgaard et al 2013).…”
Section: Relational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After all, when Charles Wright Mills (1956) made his powerful sociological statements in The Power Elite, there were based on few direct observations; moreover, he somewhat downplayed the value of ethnographic accounts, at least in the case of local community studies. 6 And if we are to demonstrate the existence of a ruling class, for example, a well-designed statistical analysis is most probably the best option (Denord et al 2018).…”
Section: The Benefits and Limitations Of Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%