2016
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/09/009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primordial features and Planck polarization

Abstract: Abstract. With the Planck 2015 Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) temperature and polarization data, we search for possible features in the primordial power spectrum (PPS). We revisit the Wiggly Whipped Inflation (WWI) framework and demonstrate how generation of some particular primordial features can improve the fit to Planck data. WWI potential allows the scalar field to transit from a steeper potential to a nearly flat potential through a discontinuity either in potential or in its derivatives. WWI offers th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
87
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
1
87
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mode 800 is restricted to the first acoustic peak and fits a small number of apparent wiggles in the data. The maximum a posteriori (MAP) of 1000 tries to fit the dip in temperature at ≈ 20 and the following peak at ≈ 40, at the cost of raising the power at ≈ 10 and below (a similar feature in 2015 data has been reported in [2,[41][42][43][44]). Despite the goodness of the fit, this is in conflict with the apparent lack of power at very small multipoles seen in Planck's data, and may impose an even more stringent upper limit on the relative amplitude r of the tensor primordial power spectrum.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The mode 800 is restricted to the first acoustic peak and fits a small number of apparent wiggles in the data. The maximum a posteriori (MAP) of 1000 tries to fit the dip in temperature at ≈ 20 and the following peak at ≈ 40, at the cost of raising the power at ≈ 10 and below (a similar feature in 2015 data has been reported in [2,[41][42][43][44]). Despite the goodness of the fit, this is in conflict with the apparent lack of power at very small multipoles seen in Planck's data, and may impose an even more stringent upper limit on the relative amplitude r of the tensor primordial power spectrum.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Due to the excellent accuracy with which the standard ΛCDM 6-parameter model fits the Planck data with l > 40, we restrict ourselves to models which, first, produce localised features in the PPS and, second, fit the smooth small-scale part of the PPS outside the features as well as possible in terms of the PPS slope n s ≈ 0.965 measured by Planck. Characteristic examples of such models are the Wiggly-wipped inflationary (WWI) models introduced in Hazra et al (2014aHazra et al ( , 2016. These models produce a better fit to the CMB data than the powerlaw model, and are thus not currently distinguishable from each other using the CMB data alone.…”
Section: The Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3: The left hand figure shows the Hubble parameter and the right shows the first slow-roll parameter for a model with features. This model which was proposed [21,22] to explain the observed features in the scalar power spectrum at ℓ ≈ 22 and ℓ ≈ 40 which are visible in the data reported from both WMAP [16,17,18] and PLANCK [19,20]. Note that the feature has little impact on H(n) but it does lead to a distinct bump in ǫ(n).…”
Section: * the Power Spectrum Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%