1997
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1997.179.163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primitive lattice points in starlike planar sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore it is natural to search for stronger estimates under the Riemann Hypothesis (RH). The exponent 1/4 in R area (x) was improved by several authors under RH (see [11], [15], [14], [16], [22]). It is also of interest to consider the distributions of P (x), A(x) and H(x) unconditionally in short intervals.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore it is natural to search for stronger estimates under the Riemann Hypothesis (RH). The exponent 1/4 in R area (x) was improved by several authors under RH (see [11], [15], [14], [16], [22]). It is also of interest to consider the distributions of P (x), A(x) and H(x) unconditionally in short intervals.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We shall estimate S 2 in a standard way. The key step is a familiar contour integration technique in the spirit of Montgomery and Vaughan [13], which is used in many occasions when estimating primitive lattice points (for example, see [7], [16], [23]). We only give an outline of the technique here.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ω-results for E ′ 2 and E ′ 3 have also been obtained [10,47]. (For more details on visible lattice points in planar domains, see [4,5,21,40,46,72,73]. )…”
Section: Visibile Lattice Points In Discsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The exponent 5/22 can be replaced by 137/604, 127/560, 37/164, 269/1238, as proved respectively by Menzer [4], Müller-Nowak-Menzer [6], Müller and Nowak [5], Nowak [7]. In this paper, we shall prove the following Theorem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%