2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10339-013-0537-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Priming the mental time-line: effects of modality and processing mode

Abstract: The notion of a mental time-line (i.e., past corresponds to left and future corresponds to right) supports the conceptual metaphor view assuming that abstract concepts like ''time'' are grounded in cognitively more accessible concepts like ''space.'' In five experiments, we further investigated the relationship between temporal and spatial representations and examined whether or not the spatial correspondents of time are unintentionally activated. We employed a priming paradigm, in which visual or auditory pri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(64 reference statements)
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some of the temporal priming experiments, the priming is more subliminal and can nevertheless positively be said to trigger an automatic activation of the mental timeline. In experiment 1 of Rolke et al (2013), for example, a considerable effect size emerged (d = 0.46), even though temporal complexity was very low since single words were used as temporal primes. Here, the need for distinguishing temporal priming studies from studies in which the temporal dimension is task irrelevant becomes apparent: While the priming studies reveal a pronounced space-time congruency effect (adjusted mean effect size: d = 0.36), the time is task irrelevant studies do not (adjusted mean effect size: d = 0.05), although both are based on automatic activation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In some of the temporal priming experiments, the priming is more subliminal and can nevertheless positively be said to trigger an automatic activation of the mental timeline. In experiment 1 of Rolke et al (2013), for example, a considerable effect size emerged (d = 0.46), even though temporal complexity was very low since single words were used as temporal primes. Here, the need for distinguishing temporal priming studies from studies in which the temporal dimension is task irrelevant becomes apparent: While the priming studies reveal a pronounced space-time congruency effect (adjusted mean effect size: d = 0.36), the time is task irrelevant studies do not (adjusted mean effect size: d = 0.05), although both are based on automatic activation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Detecting a space–time congruency effect under these circumstances certainly is more likely compared to sensicality judgments where temporal information is irrelevant for performing the task. At least 3 out of the 11 effect sizes of temporal priming arise in settings in which the temporal reference of the primes is of essential relevance for the execution of the task (see also Rolke et al., , experiment 4). This could explain why the mean effect size of temporal priming is as large compared to the other two levels of Task .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Working with predominantly European, English speaking subjects the design presented time running on a two-dimensional x-axis from left to right. (Rolke et al 2013, Fuhrman et al 2011) The user's perception of now being centred within the view with the past and performed events being to the left and future events goals and un-completed tasks to the right. Using time-line metaphors and map-style interactions allowed us to move away way from some of the restrictions of more traditional grid based, calendar style visualisation.…”
Section: Prototypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, since some research suggest that the number-space interaction exists verbal spatial coding and visuospatial coding, our results can imply that the cognition of time and number do exist differences. (Bono, Grazia, Casarotti, Priftis, Gava, Umiltà, & Zorzi, 2012;Bonato, Zorzi, & Umilta, 2012;Rolke, Fernandez, Schmid, Walker, Lachmair, Lopez et al, 2013;Ulrich, & Maienborn, 2010 (Gevers, Verguts, Reynvoet, Caessens, & Fias, 2006;Santens, & Gevers, 2008 (Walsh, 2003;Bueti & Walsh, 2009;Feigenson, 2007)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%