2015
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Priming in word stem completion tasks: comparison with previous results in word fragment completion tasks

Abstract: This study investigates priming in an implicit word stem completion (WSC) task by analyzing the effect of linguistic stimuli characteristics on said task. A total of 305 participants performed a WSC task in two phases (study and test). The test phase included 63 unique-solution stems and 63 multiple-solution stems. Analysis revealed that priming (mean = 0.22) was stronger in the case of multiple-solution stems, indicating that they were not a homogeneous group of stimuli. Thus, further analyses were performed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, priming was negatively correlated with the number of completions of the stem (r = −.16), indicating that targets having only one or few potential completions are those that produce more priming. This result is interesting, as it suggests that the number of possible completions of the stems should be considered when the priming is the dependent variable in an investigation (Soler, Dasí, & Ruiz, 2015). Second, priming SD standard deviation, SE standard error correlated negatively with word frequency (r = −.18), which is in line with previous results indicating that the highest magnitude of priming corresponds with words with the lowest frequency (Roediger et al, 1992).…”
Section: Correlation Between Indicessupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, priming was negatively correlated with the number of completions of the stem (r = −.16), indicating that targets having only one or few potential completions are those that produce more priming. This result is interesting, as it suggests that the number of possible completions of the stems should be considered when the priming is the dependent variable in an investigation (Soler, Dasí, & Ruiz, 2015). Second, priming SD standard deviation, SE standard error correlated negatively with word frequency (r = −.18), which is in line with previous results indicating that the highest magnitude of priming corresponds with words with the lowest frequency (Roediger et al, 1992).…”
Section: Correlation Between Indicessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The role of this variable in predicting priming is currently under debate, as its influence has been observed in some studies (e.g., Soler et al, 2015), but not in others (e.g., Gibson, 2012). All these results suggest once again that the variable number of completions should be a criterion when selecting stimuli in WSC tasks.…”
Section: Priming and Baseline Completion Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the trait-judgment task, one set of 20 and another set of 50 trait adjectives (half of which were classified as positive and half as negative ) were selected from the Aachen List of Trait Words [42]. Several stimulus properties were controlled for in the second set of 50 trait adjectives (because the first set was not relevant for further analyses; see section on trait-judgment task) in order to rule out systematic biases in participants’ choices and their memory [43, 44]. To test whether the 25 positive and 25 negative adjectives in the second set differed with respect to the word length, word frequency, absolute value of the valence, and absolute value of social desirability, a multivariate factorial analysis of variance (MANOVA) was performed using post hoc univariate analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, for the prime 'reliable', the stem would be 'rel' and possible completions would include 'reliable', 'relevant', 'relax' etc. Valid inferences from a stem completion task clearly depend on each stem having an appropriate minimum number of alternate completions (Soler, Dasí, & Ruiz, 2015). Studies have consistently demonstrated that when participants report being unable to read the prime i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%