2016
DOI: 10.1080/23745118.2016.1225655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prime ministerial careers in the European Union: does gender make a difference?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of European democracies, Verge and Astudillo (2018) find that female members of (regional) executives are even better equipped for the job than their male counterparts. Moreover, men and women who get to the top executive post (HoG) display no systematic differences in their career paths (Baturo and Gray 2018; Müller-Rommel and Vercesi 2017).…”
Section: Case Selection and Operationalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of European democracies, Verge and Astudillo (2018) find that female members of (regional) executives are even better equipped for the job than their male counterparts. Moreover, men and women who get to the top executive post (HoG) display no systematic differences in their career paths (Baturo and Gray 2018; Müller-Rommel and Vercesi 2017).…”
Section: Case Selection and Operationalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 We use “female” as a reference category. Female PMs struggle with a double disadvantage that influences the relationship we aim to study: They are less likely to have gathered extensive political experience, because women at the top—in CEE like in Western European countries—are still scarce (Franceschet et al, 2019; Müller-Rommel & Vercesi, 2017). At the same time, they might be forced to resign more frequently between elections (as indicated by research on ministers by Bright et al, 2015), leaving them with little time and room to perform successfully.…”
Section: Case Selection Operationalization and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, political elites are traditionally male, with a higher socio-economic status, and well-educated (Putnam, 1976;Bovens and Wille, 2017;Gaxie, 2018). Moreover, they are used to reach higher political offices after acquiring some political expertise at lower levels and following paths of political professionalization (Blondel and Thiébault, 1991;Allen, 2013;MacKenzie, 2015;Müller-Rommel and Vercesi, 2017). On the other hand, family environments, political organizations and political institutions where individuals "learn and live" politics affect politicians' preferences and attitudes towards career paths (Searing et al, 1973;Mughan et al, 1997;Scully, 2005;Beauvallet-Haddad and Michon, 2010;Pilet et al, 2014;Daniel, 2015).…”
Section: Agency and Political Careers: Actor-oriented Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%