1981
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8693(81)90218-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prime graph components of finite groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
364
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 462 publications
(367 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
364
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a generalization of this result, we prove the following theorem: By using the classification of finite simple groups, the structure of a finite group G such that its prime graph is not connected has been determined by Gruenberg and Kegel, in an unpublished paper. Later, Williams published this result together with a classification of finite simple groups with disconnected prime graph, which are distinct from Lie-type groups of even characteristic; see [24]. In [8], a similar description was given for simple Lie-type groups in an even characteristic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…As a generalization of this result, we prove the following theorem: By using the classification of finite simple groups, the structure of a finite group G such that its prime graph is not connected has been determined by Gruenberg and Kegel, in an unpublished paper. Later, Williams published this result together with a classification of finite simple groups with disconnected prime graph, which are distinct from Lie-type groups of even characteristic; see [24]. In [8], a similar description was given for simple Lie-type groups in an even characteristic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…According to this partition, ω i (G) is a subset of π i (G)-numbers of ω(G) for every 1 i s(G). LEMMA 2.1 (Gruenberg-Kegel, see [24]). If G is a finite group with s(G) > 1, then one of the following holds:…”
Section: Gruenberg-kegel Graph and Groups Isospectral To Simple Groupsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By Lemma 3.3, w 0 is of p-defect zero. Recall that p is adjacent to 2 (see [26]). Suppose that p ¼ 3.…”
Section: Lemma 32 ([23mentioning
confidence: 99%