2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.geobios.2021.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primates and Plesiadapiformes from Cos (Eocene; Quercy, France)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis included 25 described species of paromomyids, in addition to the two newly described species in the present study. Although the recently described Arcius moniquae (Godinot et al, 2021) was not included in our analysis, its exclusion would likely have little to no effect on the positions of E. greggi and I. glenbowensis given the robust sampling of Arcius in our dataset (i.e., six out of seven species represented). Non-paromomyid plesiadapiforms were included as immediate outgroups, including palaechthonids (Premnoides Gunnell, 1989, Plesiolestes Jepsen, 1930, Torrejonia Gazin, 1968, and Palaechthon Gidley, 1923, one micromomyid (Foxomomys Chester and Bloch, 2013), one microsyopid (Navajovius Matthew and Granger, 1921), and one purgatoriid (Purgatorius Van Valen and Sloan, 1965).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis included 25 described species of paromomyids, in addition to the two newly described species in the present study. Although the recently described Arcius moniquae (Godinot et al, 2021) was not included in our analysis, its exclusion would likely have little to no effect on the positions of E. greggi and I. glenbowensis given the robust sampling of Arcius in our dataset (i.e., six out of seven species represented). Non-paromomyid plesiadapiforms were included as immediate outgroups, including palaechthonids (Premnoides Gunnell, 1989, Plesiolestes Jepsen, 1930, Torrejonia Gazin, 1968, and Palaechthon Gidley, 1923, one micromomyid (Foxomomys Chester and Bloch, 2013), one microsyopid (Navajovius Matthew and Granger, 1921), and one purgatoriid (Purgatorius Van Valen and Sloan, 1965).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis included 25 described species of paromomyids, in addition to the two newly described species in the present study. Although the recently described Arcius moniquae (Godinot et al, 2021) was not included in our analysis, its exclusion would likely have little to no effect on the positions of E . greggi and I .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cos constitutes the seventh pre-upper Eocene locality of Phosphorites du Quercy (for others see Astruc et al [2003]: Pasturat [MP 8 + 9], Viélase and Cazals [both MP 10–11], Cuzal, Parnac and Grélaou [all MP 13]). Based on the studies of the primates (Godinot et al, 2021) and rodents (Vianey-Liaud et al, 2022), the vertebrate fauna of the Cos site has been dated as MP 10–11, a zone that spans the late Ypresian and early Lutetian. Thus, it corresponds to the Early Eocene Climatic Optimum (EECO; see Inglis et al, 2020), which is dated as 53.3–49.1 Ma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a few scattered vertebrate fossils through the entire section. The fauna recovered includes amphibians, squamates, crocodilians, birds, and more than 20 mammal species among which only primates and rodents have been studied (Godinot et al, 2021; Vianey-Liaud et al, 2022). All of the specimens described herein are from the Cos fissure fill of the Phosphorites du Quercy region and are lower Eocene (MP 10–11 interval) in age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%