2023
DOI: 10.24072/pcjournal.259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primate sympatry shapes the evolution of their brain architecture

Abstract: The main hypotheses on the evolution of animal cognition emphasise the role of conspecifics in affecting the socio-ecological environment shaping cognition. Yet, space is often simultaneously occupied by multiple species from the same ecological guild. These sympatric species can compete for food, which may thereby stimulate or hamper cognition. Considering brain size as a proxy for cognition, we tested whether species sympatry impacted the evolution of cognition in frugivorous primates. We first retraced the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
(137 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…from black kites, Milvus migrans, or common swifts, Apus apus, [107,108]). Interactions with heterospecifics can indeed drastically affect animals' daily life [109], up to shaping the cognitive machinery underpinning their foraging decisions [110]. How heterospecific cues are used when foraging remains clearly overlooked.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…from black kites, Milvus migrans, or common swifts, Apus apus, [107,108]). Interactions with heterospecifics can indeed drastically affect animals' daily life [109], up to shaping the cognitive machinery underpinning their foraging decisions [110]. How heterospecific cues are used when foraging remains clearly overlooked.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…from black kites, Milvus migrans, or common swifts, Apus apus, [99,100]). Interactions with heterospecifics can indeed drastically affect animals' daily life [101], up to shaping the cognitive machinery underpinning their foraging decisions [102]. How heterospecific cues are used when foraging remains clearly overlooked.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%