1988
DOI: 10.1159/000156341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primate Play Vocalizations and Their Functional Significance

Abstract: It is well known that, among mammals, specific play vocalizations are produced exclusively by certain nonhuman primate species. In order to investigate the functional significance of these calls, we examined their phyletic distribution among New World and Old World monkeys. The results indicate that such calls are produced by species in which allomothering behaviour occurs. We propose a functional explanation of play vocalizations according to which they serve as a possible source of information for maternal r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonsocial behaviors measured included eating, sleeping, sitting alone, piloerection and scent-marking behaviors (including gouging, which is characterized by chewing cage furniture and is shown in conjunction with scent marking in this species). Three types of vocalizations were scored: the chatter, twitter and squeal (defined in Table 1; Voland, 1977;Stevenson & Poole, 1982;Masataka & Kohda, 1988;Harris & Newman, 1988). Identity of vocalizers was attributable by distinct facial characteristics and/ or body movements in the case of twittering.…”
Section: Behaviors Scoredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonsocial behaviors measured included eating, sleeping, sitting alone, piloerection and scent-marking behaviors (including gouging, which is characterized by chewing cage furniture and is shown in conjunction with scent marking in this species). Three types of vocalizations were scored: the chatter, twitter and squeal (defined in Table 1; Voland, 1977;Stevenson & Poole, 1982;Masataka & Kohda, 1988;Harris & Newman, 1988). Identity of vocalizers was attributable by distinct facial characteristics and/ or body movements in the case of twittering.…”
Section: Behaviors Scoredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in cases in which multiple animals are playing together, it may not be readily observable as to which animal is biting, slapping or pushing, so the playfulness of any given contact may be ambiguous , and such polyadic encounters are accompanied by a greater frequency of play signals compared to dyadic ones (Palagi, 2008). While visual signals, such as the play-face in primates (Van Hooff, 1967) and the play bow in dogs (Bekoff, 1995), are most familiar, play signals occurring in other sensory modalities, such as vocalizations, (Biben and Symmes, 1986;Masataka and Kohda, 1988;Rasa, 1984;Kipper and Todt, 2002) and chemical cues (e.g., Wilson, 1973), have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While rat USVs clearly represent a unique form of mammalian play vocalisations, there are other acoustic distinctions across species' play vocalisations that suggest theoretical alternatives to being evolved from laboured breathing. For example, among several New World primates (Platyrrhini), play vocalisations are often described as highpitched peeps, whistles, or squeals (Cleveland and Snowdon 1982;Biben and Symmes 1986;Masataka and Kohda 1988). Masataka and Kohda (1988) argued that these vocalisations evolved from a location or contact call given by infants towards their mothers during allomothering, rather than from laboured breathing during play.…”
Section: Acoustic Features Of Play Vocalisationsmentioning
confidence: 99%