2010
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.21272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primate cranial diversity

Abstract: Many studies in primate and human evolution focus on aspects of cranial morphology to address issues of systematics, phylogeny, and functional anatomy. However, broad analyses of cranial diversity within Primates as an Order are notably absent. In this study, we present a 3D geometric morphometric analysis of primate cranial morphology, providing a multivariate comparison of the major patterns of cranial shape change during primate evolution and quantitative assessments of cranial diversity among different cla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
57
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
57
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Scientists currently recognise 20 different living genera divided into two distinct adaptive radiations: the cercopithecines, who live in terrestrial and arboreal habitats and forage for a variety of foods, but mostly fruit; and the colobines, who live in arboreal habitats and rely upon leaves and seeds for major portions of their diet. Interestingly, cercopithecoids have achieved this diversity in spite of being less varied anatomically and in their social behaviour than other primate groups (Szalay and Delson, 1979;Di Fiore and Rendall, 1994; but see Fleagle et al, 2010). Cercopithecoids also have an extensive fossil record, especially in Africa, which shows that Old World monkeys are both a relatively recent adaptive radiation and that in the past they were even more diverse and occupied an even greater geographic, taxonomic and ecological range (Jablonski, 2002;Jablonski and Frost, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientists currently recognise 20 different living genera divided into two distinct adaptive radiations: the cercopithecines, who live in terrestrial and arboreal habitats and forage for a variety of foods, but mostly fruit; and the colobines, who live in arboreal habitats and rely upon leaves and seeds for major portions of their diet. Interestingly, cercopithecoids have achieved this diversity in spite of being less varied anatomically and in their social behaviour than other primate groups (Szalay and Delson, 1979;Di Fiore and Rendall, 1994; but see Fleagle et al, 2010). Cercopithecoids also have an extensive fossil record, especially in Africa, which shows that Old World monkeys are both a relatively recent adaptive radiation and that in the past they were even more diverse and occupied an even greater geographic, taxonomic and ecological range (Jablonski, 2002;Jablonski and Frost, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are based in simulating a large set of random selection vectors in order to measure a Matrix ability to respond. The Malagasy primates display an impressive range of sizes, specially considering the recently extinct forms (Bennett and Goswami, 2012;Fleagle et al, 2010;Godfrey and Jungers, 2003;Mittermeier et al, 2010). Given that our results suggest natural selection as an evolutionary process contributing to the divergence between 5 means, we can estimate selection gradients and evaluate species magnitudes of response to selection and its alignment with the adaptive landscape.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O primeiro trabalho a investigar a morfologia craniana em um contexto mais amplo da diversidade da ordem Primates foi Fleagle et al (2010 pecialmente no gênero Eulemur). Além disso, existem trabalhos que reportam dimorfismo de grau leve a moderado (quando comparado com aquele presente em demais primatas) em medidas relacionadas a tamanho corpóreo e de dentição, como caninos e premolares.…”
Section: A Morfologia Craniana De Lêmures No Contexto Da Ordem Primatesunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations