2019
DOI: 10.1109/tmc.2018.2828104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary User-Aware Optimal Discovery Routing for Cognitive Radio Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This section presents the experimental analysis using proposed approach and the performance of proposed JCIAR approach is compared with the state of art techniques such as Primary User Aware k-hop (PAK) [16], AODV [13], CAODV [13], and LAUNCH [25]. According to the proposed model we have introduced an interference parameter which has significant impact on the switching delay performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This section presents the experimental analysis using proposed approach and the performance of proposed JCIAR approach is compared with the state of art techniques such as Primary User Aware k-hop (PAK) [16], AODV [13], CAODV [13], and LAUNCH [25]. According to the proposed model we have introduced an interference parameter which has significant impact on the switching delay performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there exists a tradeoff between routing overhead and route selection. In order to overcome this issue, guirguis et al, [16] presented a primary useraware k hop routing scheme which represents the routing discovery radius and this model can be incorporated into any CRN protocol. In this case, multiple hops are identified and adapted in the network topology based on the user-defined utility function.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, multi-path OR metrics are opportunistic as is OR itself. While locality and globality concepts in routing protocols [103] and in routing metrics are consistent, it is essential to distinguish between the concept of single-/multi-path in routing protocols [22] and in routing metrics. The single-/multi-path concept in routing protocols regards implementing the transmission policy through a single (multiple) path(s) which has (have) been previously ranked by their embedded routing metrics.…”
Section: Or Metrics: a Complete Classification Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the existing QoS-aware routing schemes focus on searching the feasible routes subject to single or multiple QoS constraints, and select the best routes with no consideration of the frame level queuing delays, which is the case in the fronthaul bridged networks due to the simultaneous transmissions of the globally synchronized eCPRI bursts. Moreover, a high control messages overhead with the legacy routing schemes [31] due to the dynamic selection of the paths and continuous monitoring of the networking parameters further increases the delays, which makes them unsuitable for the E2E latency constraints of the EFBNs.…”
Section: State Of the Art-ethernet Based Fronthaul Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%